Page 41 of 277 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

On BIG-IP APM 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.3, 13.0.0, and 13.1.0-13.1.0.3, APMD may core when processing SAML Assertion or response containing certain elements. En BIG-IP APM 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.3, 13.0.0 y 13.1.0-13.1.0.3, APMD podría entrar en "core" al procesar una aserción SAML o una respuesta que contiene ciertos elementos. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105345 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K05018525 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in BIG-IP APM portal access 11.5.1-11.5.7, 11.6.0-11.6.3, and 12.1.0-12.1.3 discloses the BIG-IP software version in rewritten pages. Una vulnerabilidad en el acceso al portal de BIG-IP APM 11.5.1-11.5.7, 11.6.0-11.6.3 y 12.1.0-12.1.3 revela la versión de software de BIG-IP en las páginas reescritas. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K40625021 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

The svpn and policyserver components of the F5 BIG-IP APM client prior to version 7.1.7.1 for Linux and macOS runs as a privileged process and can allow an unprivileged user to get ownership of files owned by root on the local client host. A malicious local unprivileged user may gain knowledge of sensitive information, manipulate certain data, or assume super-user privileges on the local client host. Los componentes svpn y policyserver del cliente F5 BIG-IP APM en versiones anteriores a la 7.1.7.1 para Linux y macOS se ejecutan como un proceso privilegiado y pueden permitir que un usuario sin privilegios obtenga la propiedad de archivos propiedad de root en el host del cliente local. Un usuario local no privilegiado malicioso puede adquirir conocimiento de información sensible, manipular determinados datos o asumir privilegios de superusuario en el host del cliente local. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041510 https://github.com/mirchr/security-research/blob/master/vulnerabilities/F5/CVE-2018-5529.txt https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K54431371 • CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 152EXPL: 0

The Linux kernel, versions 3.9+, is vulnerable to a denial of service attack with low rates of specially modified packets targeting IP fragment re-assembly. An attacker may cause a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted IP fragments. Various vulnerabilities in IP fragmentation have been discovered and fixed over the years. The current vulnerability (CVE-2018-5391) became exploitable in the Linux kernel with the increase of the IP fragment reassembly queue size. El kernel de Linux en versiones a partir de la 3.9 es vulnerable a un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) con tasas bajas de paquetes especialmente modificados que apuntan hacia el reensamblado de fragmentos de IP. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105108 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041476 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041637 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 78%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0

Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •