Page 42 of 235 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6166

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6166

In BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM, and WebSafe software 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, in some cases the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may crash when processing fragmented packets. This vulnerability affects TMM through a virtual server configured with a FastL4 profile. Traffic processing is disrupted while TMM restarts. If the affected BIG-IP system is configured as part of a device group, it will trigger a failover to the peer device. En el software BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM y WebSafe desde la versión 12.0.0 a la 12.1.1, en algunos casos, el componente Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) podría cerrarse inesperadamente al procesar paquetes fragmentados. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102264 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039949 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K65615624 • CWE-415: Double Free •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6168

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6168

On BIG-IP versions 11.6.0-11.6.2 (fixed in 11.6.2 HF1), 12.0.0-12.1.2 HF1 (fixed in 12.1.2 HF2), or 13.0.0-13.0.0 HF2 (fixed in 13.0.0 HF3) a virtual server configured with a Client SSL profile may be vulnerable to an Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext attack (AKA Bleichenbacher attack) against RSA, which when exploited, may result in plaintext recovery of encrypted messages and/or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack, despite the attacker not having gained access to the server's private key itself, aka a ROBOT attack. En BIG-IP en las versiones desde la 11.6.0 hasta la 11.6.2 (solucionado en la versión 11.6.2 HF1), desde la 12.0.0 hasta la 12.1.2 HF1 (solucionado en la versión 12.1.2 HF2) o desde la 13.0.0 hasta la 13.0.0 HF2 (solucionado en la versión 13.0.0 HF3) un servidor virtual configurado con un perfil SSL de cliente puede ser vulnerable a un ataque adaptativo de texto cifrado escogido (también conocido como ataque Bleichenbacher) contra RSA. Cuando se explota este ataque, puede dar lugar a la recuperación de texto plano de mensajes cifrados y/o a un ataque Man-in-the-middle (MiTM), a pesar de que el atacante no haya obtenido acceso a la propia clave privada del servidor. Esto también se conoce como ataque ROBOT. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101901 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039839 https://robotattack.org https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K21905460 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/144389 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6160

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6160

In F5 BIG-IP AAM and PEM software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.4.1 to 11.5.4, a remote attacker may create maliciously crafted HTTP request to cause Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to restart and temporarily fail to process traffic. This issue is exposed on virtual servers using a Policy Enforcement profile or a Web Acceleration profile. Systems that do not have BIG-IP AAM module provisioned are not vulnerable. The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may restart and temporarily fail to process traffic. Systems that do not have BIG-IP AAM or PEM module provisioned are not vulnerable. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101632 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039670 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K19430431 •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 109EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6161

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6161

In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator software version 12.0.0 - 12.1.2, 11.6.0 - 11.6.1, 11.4.0 - 11.5.4, 11.2.1, when ConfigSync is configured, attackers on adjacent networks may be able to bypass the TLS protections usually used to encrypted and authenticate connections to mcpd. This vulnerability may allow remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack via resource exhaustion. En F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator en versiones de software de la 12.0.0 a la 12.1.2, de la 11.6.0 a la 11.6.1, de la 11.4.0 a la 11.5.4 y en la versión 11.2.1, cuando ConfigSync está configurado, los atacantes en redes adyacentes pueden omitir las protecciones TLS, normalmente utilizadas para cifrar y autenticar conexiones al mcpd. Esta vulnerabilidad podría permitir que atacantes remotos provoquen un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) mediante el agotamiento de recursos. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101636 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039675 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039676 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K62279530 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0

CVE-2017-6157

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-6157

In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM and Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.5.0 - 11.5.4, virtual servers with a configuration using the HTTP Explicit Proxy functionality and/or SOCKS profile are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, remote attack that allows modification of BIG-IP system configuration, extraction of sensitive system files, and/or possible remote command execution on the BIG-IP system. En F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM y Websafe en sus versiones de software de la 12.0.0 a la 12.1.1, de la 11.6.0 a la 11.6.1 y de la 11.5.0 a la 11.5.4, los servidores virtuales con una configuración que utiliza la funcionalidad HTTP Explicit Proxy y/o el perfil SOCKS son vulnerables a un ataque remoto no autenticado que permite que se modifique la configuración del sistema BIG-IP, se extraigan archivos sensibles del sistema y se puedan ejecutar comandos remotamente en el sistema BIG-IP. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101634 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039672 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K02692210 •