Page 42 of 691 results (0.029 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 47.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. Múltiples vulnerabilidades no especificadas en el motor del navegador en Mozilla Firefox en versiones anteriores a 47.0 y Firefox ESR 45.x en versiones anteriores a 45.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00055.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00008.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3600 http:/&#x • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

Heap-based buffer overflow in the iscsi_aio_ioctl function in block/iscsi.c in QEMU allows local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (QEMU process crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted iSCSI asynchronous I/O ioctl call. Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica en la función iscsi_aio_ioctl en block/iscsi.c en QEMU permite a usuarios locales del SO invitado provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del proceso QEMU) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una llamada iSCSI ioctl I/O asíncrona manipulada. Quick Emulator(QEMU) built with the Block driver for iSCSI images support (virtio-blk) is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow issue. The flaw could occur while processing iSCSI asynchronous I/O ioctl(2) calls. A user inside a guest could exploit this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in denial of service, or potentially leverage it to execute arbitrary code with QEMU-process privileges on the host. • http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a6b3167fa0e825aebb5a7cd8b437b6d41584a196 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1606.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1607.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1653.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1654.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1655.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1756.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1763.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-secu • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0

The VGA module in QEMU improperly performs bounds checking on banked access to video memory, which allows local guest OS administrators to execute arbitrary code on the host by changing access modes after setting the bank register, aka the "Dark Portal" issue. El módulo VGA en QEMU lleva a cabo incorrectamente comprobaciones de límites sobre acceso almacenado a la memoria de vídeo, lo que permite a administradores locales de SO invitado ejecutar código arbitrario sobre el anfitrión cambiando los modos de acceso después de establecer el banco de registros, también conocido como el problema "Dark Portal". An out-of-bounds read/write access flaw was found in the way QEMU's VGA emulation with VESA BIOS Extensions (VBE) support performed read/write operations using I/O port methods. A privileged guest user could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the host with the privileges of the host's QEMU process. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0724.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0725.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0997.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0999.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1000.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1001.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1002.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1019.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1943.html http://suppor • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 90%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer underflow and memory corruption) via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue. La implementación ASN.1 en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1o y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2c permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento inferior de buffer y corrupción de memoria) a través de un campo ANY en datos serializados manipulados, también conocido como el problema "cero negativo". A flaw was found in the way OpenSSL encoded certain ASN.1 data structures. An attacker could use this flaw to create a specially crafted certificate which, when verified or re-encoded by OpenSSL, could cause it to crash, or execute arbitrary code using the permissions of the user running an application compiled against the OpenSSL library. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 60EXPL: 2

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. La implementación de AES-NI en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1t y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2h no considera la asignación de memoria durante una comprobación de relleno determinada, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información de texto claro sensible a través de un ataque de padding-oracle contra una sesión AES CBC . NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una corrección incorrecta para CVE-2013-0169. It was discovered that OpenSSL leaked timing information when decrypting TLS/SSL and DTLS protocol encrypted records when the connection used the AES CBC cipher suite and the server supported AES-NI. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39768 https://github.com/FiloSottile/CVE-2016-2107 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •