CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2012-6302
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6302
Soapbox through 0.3.1: Sandbox bypass - runs a second instance of Soapbox within a sandboxed Soapbox. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/12/10/1 • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management •
CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-5870 – chromium-browser: Use-after-free in media
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-5870
Use after free in media in Google Chrome prior to 77.0.3865.75 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. • https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html https://crbug.com/999311 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-5870 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762366 • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16538 – jenkins-script-security-plugin: sandbox protection bypass leads to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16538
A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.67 and earlier related to the handling of default parameter expressions in closures allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. ... A sandbox bypass flaw was found in the Jenkins Script Security Plugin versions 1.67 and earlier, that are related to the handling of closure default parameter expressions. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/11/21/1 https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2019-11-21/#SECURITY-1658 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-16538 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819652 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 9.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10431 – jenkins-script-security: Sandbox bypass vulnerability in Script Security Plugin
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10431
A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.64 and earlier related to the handling of default parameter expressions in constructors allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/01/2 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4055 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4089 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4097 https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2019-10-01/#SECURITY-1579 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10431 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764390 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0CVE-2019-12668 – Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Stored Banner Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-12668
A vulnerability in the web framework code of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web interface of the affected software using the banner parameter. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of the banner parameters that are passed to the web server of the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a banner parameter and saving it. The attacker could then convince a user of the web interface to access a malicious link or could intercept a user request for the affected web interface and inject malicious code into the request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected web interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information. • https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190925-sbxss • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •