CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6647
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6647
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attackers with access to the management interface could eventually deplete memory on the system. En BIG-IP versiones 14.1.0 hasta 14.1.0.5, 14.0.0 hasta 14.0.0.4, 13.0.0 hasta 13.1.2, 12.1.0 hasta 12.1.4.1, 11.5.2 hasta 11.6.4, cuando se procesan intentos de autenticación por parte usuarios del plano de control del MCPD se pierde una pequeña cantidad de memoria. En condiciones poco comunes, los atacantes con acceso a la interfaz de administración podrían agotar la memoria del sistema. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K87920510 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6645
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6645
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, FTP traffic passing through a Virtual Server with both an active FTP profile associated and connection mirroring configured may lead to a TMM crash causing the configured HA action to be taken. En BIG-IP versiones 14.0.0 hasta 14.1.0.5, 13.0.0 hasta 13.1.2, 12.1.0 hasta 12.1.4.1, 11.5.2 hasta 11.6.4, el tráfico FTP que pasa por medio de un servidor virtual tanto con un perfil FTP asociado activo como con el reflejo de conexión configurado, puede conllevar a un bloqueo de TMM causando que la acción HA sea tomada. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K15759349 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K15759349?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 2CVE-2019-10744 – nodejs-lodash: prototype pollution in defaultsDeep function leading to modifying properties
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10744
Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. Las versiones de lodash inferiores a 4.17.12, son vulnerables a la Contaminación de Prototipo. La función defaultsDeep podría ser engañada para agregar o modificar las propiedades de Object.prototype usando una carga útil de constructor. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in lodash. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-10744 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3024 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191004-0005 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-450202 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K47105354?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10744 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •