Page 43 of 733 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing attackers to gain host OS privileges via DMA in a situation where an untrusted domain has access to a physical device. This occurs because passed through PCI devices may corrupt host memory after deassignment. When a PCI device is assigned to an untrusted domain, it is possible for that domain to program the device to DMA to an arbitrary address. The IOMMU is used to protect the host from malicious DMA by making sure that the device addresses can only target memory assigned to the guest. However, when the guest domain is torn down, or the device is deassigned, the device is assigned back to dom0, thus allowing any in-flight DMA to potentially target critical host data. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00037.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/31/6 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-302.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2BQKX7M2RHCWDBKNPX4KEBI3MJIH6AYZ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I5WWPW4BSZDDW7VHU427XTVXV7ROOFFW https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IZYATWNUG • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to gain host OS privileges by leveraging race conditions in pagetable promotion and demotion operations. There are issues with restartable PV type change operations. To avoid using shadow pagetables for PV guests, Xen exposes the actual hardware pagetables to the guest. In order to prevent the guest from modifying these page tables directly, Xen keeps track of how pages are used using a type system; pages must be "promoted" before being used as a pagetable, and "demoted" before being used for any other type. Xen also allows for "recursive" promotions: i.e., an operating system promoting a page to an L4 pagetable may end up causing pages to be promoted to L3s, which may in turn cause pages to be promoted to L2s, and so on. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00037.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/31/3 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-299.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2BQKX7M2RHCWDBKNPX4KEBI3MJIH6AYZ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I5WWPW4BSZDDW7VHU427XTVXV7ROOFFW https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IZYATWNUG • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in Samba, all versions starting samba 4.5.0 before samba 4.9.15, samba 4.10.10, samba 4.11.2, in the way it handles a user password change or a new password for a samba user. The Samba Active Directory Domain Controller can be configured to use a custom script to check for password complexity. This configuration can fail to verify password complexity when non-ASCII characters are used in the password, which could lead to weak passwords being set for samba users, making it vulnerable to dictionary attacks. Se encontró un fallo en Samba, todas las versiones iniciando samba versiones 4.5.0 anteriores a samba 4.9.15, samba versión 4.10.10, samba versión 4.11.2, en la manera en que maneja un cambio de contraseña de usuario o una nueva contraseña para un usuario de samba. El Controlador de Dominio Active Directory de Samba puede ser configurado para usar un script personalizado para comprobar la complejidad de la contraseña. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00015.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14833 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00013.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OKPYHDFI7HRELVXBE5J4MTGSI35AKFBI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UMIYCYXCPRTVCVZ3TP6ZGPJ6RZS3IX4G https: • CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness CWE-521: Weak Password Requirements •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in samba 4.0.0 before samba 4.9.15 and samba 4.10.x before 4.10.10. An attacker can crash AD DC LDAP server via dirsync resulting in denial of service. Privilege escalation is not possible with this issue. Se encontró un fallo en samba versión 4.0.0 anteriores a samba 4.9.15 y samba versiones 4.10.x anteriores a 4.10.10. Un atacante puede bloquear el servidor AD DC LDAP por medio de la sincronización de directorios resultando en la denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00015.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14847 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00013.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OKPYHDFI7HRELVXBE5J4MTGSI35AKFBI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XQ3IUACPZJXSC4OM6P2V4IC4QMZQZWPD https: • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 2

Go before 1.12.11 and 1.3.x before 1.13.2 can panic upon an attempt to process network traffic containing an invalid DSA public key. There are several attack scenarios, such as traffic from a client to a server that verifies client certificates. Go versiones anteriores a 1.12.11 y versiones 1.3.x anteriores a 1.13.2, puede entrar en pánico tras intentar procesar el tráfico de red que contiene una clave pública DSA no válida. Existen varios escenarios de ataque, tal y como el tráfico de un cliente hacia un servidor que comprueba los certificados del cliente. • https://github.com/pquerna/poc-dsa-verify-CVE-2019-17596 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00043.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00044.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0101 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0329 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/34960 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-announce/lVEm7llp0w0/VbafyRkgCgAJ https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00014.html https& • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict •