CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3715 – ImageMagick Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3715
The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 60EXPL: 2CVE-2016-2107 – OpenSSL - Padding Oracle in AES-NI CBC MAC Check
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2107
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. La implementación de AES-NI en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1t y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2h no considera la asignación de memoria durante una comprobación de relleno determinada, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información de texto claro sensible a través de un ataque de padding-oracle contra una sesión AES CBC . NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una corrección incorrecta para CVE-2013-0169. It was discovered that OpenSSL leaked timing information when decrypting TLS/SSL and DTLS protocol encrypted records when the connection used the AES CBC cipher suite and the server supported AES-NI. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39768 https://github.com/FiloSottile/CVE-2016-2107 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0264 – JDK: buffer overflow vulnerability in the IBM JVM
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0264
Buffer overflow in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. Desbordamiento de buffer en Java Virtual Machine (JVM) en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores no especificados. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0363 – JDK: insecure use of invoke method in CORBA component, incorrect CVE-2013-3009 fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0363
The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. La clase com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 en versiones anteriores a SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 en versiones anteriores a SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 en versiones anteriores a SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40) y 8 en versiones anteriores a SR3 (8.0.3.0) utiliza el método de invocación de la clase java.lang.reflect.Method en un bloque AccessController doPrivileged, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llamar a setSecurityManager y eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de vectores relacionados con una instancia a un objeto Proxy implementando la interfaz java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2013-3009. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •