CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2024-36003 – ice: fix LAG and VF lock dependency in ice_reset_vf()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-36003
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix LAG and VF lock dependency in ice_reset_vf() 9f74a3dfcf83 ("ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed over aggregate"), the ice driver has acquired the LAG mutex in ice_reset_vf(). The commit placed this lock acquisition just prior to the acquisition of the VF configuration lock. If ice_reset_vf() acquires the configuration lock via the ICE_VF_RESET_LOCK flag, this could deadlock with ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg() because it always acquires the locks in the order of the VF configuration lock and then the LAG mutex. Lockdep reports this violation almost immediately on creating and then removing 2 VF: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.8.0-rc6 #54 Tainted: G W O ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/60:3/6771 is trying to acquire lock: ff40d43e099380a0 (&vf->cfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] but task is already holding lock: ff40d43ea1961210 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0 ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg+0x45/0x690 [ice] ice_vc_process_vf_msg+0x4f5/0x870 [ice] __ice_clean_ctrlq+0x2b5/0x600 [ice] ice_service_task+0x2c9/0x480 [ice] process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0 kthread+0x104/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #0 (&vf->cfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50 validate_chain+0x558/0x800 __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0 ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ice_process_vflr_event+0x98/0xd0 [ice] ice_service_task+0x1cc/0x480 [ice] process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0 kthread+0x104/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&pf->lag_mutex); lock(&vf->cfg_lock); lock(&pf->lag_mutex); lock(&vf->cfg_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/60:3/6771: #0: ff40d43e05428b38 ((wq_completion)ice){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0 #1: ff50d06e05197e58 ((work_completion)(&pf->serv_task)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0 #2: ff40d43ea1960e50 (&pf->vfs.table_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_process_vflr_event+0x48/0xd0 [ice] #3: ff40d43ea1961210 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice] stack backtrace: CPU: 60 PID: 6771 Comm: kworker/60:3 Tainted: G W O 6.8.0-rc6 #54 Hardware name: Workqueue: ice ice_service_task [ice] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50 ? save_trace+0x59/0x230 ? add_chain_cache+0x109/0x450 validate_chain+0x558/0x800 __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ? • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd7f7a8ad3363fd94fc3868616cc70a1d8dfc01b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f74a3dfcf83e11aedcb98250b8040dbc6d9659a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/740717774dc37338404d10726967d582414f638c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de8631d8c9df08440268630200e64b623a5f69e6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96fdd1f6b4ed72a741fb0eb705c0e13049b8721f https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-36003 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281958 •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2024-36000 – mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-36000
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/ 350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock); Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map together. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd() will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock held. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mm/hugetlb: corrige la falta de Hugetlb_lock para descarga de resv. Hay un informe reciente sobre UFFDIO_COPY sobre Hugetlb: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/ 350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock); Debería ser un problema en hugetlb pero se activa en un contexto de error de usuario, donde entra en la ruta poco probable en la que dos subprocesos modifican el mapa resv juntos. Mike tiene una solución en esa ruta para la descarga de resv, pero parece que se pasó por alto el criterio de bloqueo: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd() actualizará el puntero de cgroup, por lo que es necesario llamarlo con el bloqueo retenido. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79aa925bf239c234be8586780e482872dc4690dd https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f87004c0b2bdf0f1066b88795d8e6c1dfad6cea0 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c806333efea1000a2a9620926f560ad2e1ca7cc https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6c5d21db16a0910152ec8aa9d5a7aed72694505 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/538faabf31e9c53d8c870d114846fda958a0de10 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b76b46902c2d0395488c8412e1116c2486cdfcb2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-36000 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281968 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35999 – smb3: missing lock when picking channel
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35999
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb3: missing lock when picking channel Coverity spotted a place where we should have been holding the channel lock when accessing the ses channel index. Addresses-Coverity: 1582039 ("Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)") En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: smb3: falta el bloqueo al seleccionar el canal. Coverity detectó un lugar donde deberíamos haber mantenido el bloqueo del canal al acceder al índice del canal ses. Direcciones-Cobertura: 1582039 ("Condición de ejecución de datos (MISSING_LOCK)") • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98c7ed29cd754ae7475dc7cb3f33399fda902729 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0fcf7e219448e937681216353c9a58abae6d3c2e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60ab245292280905603bc0d3654f4cf8fceccb00 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8094a600245e9b28eb36a13036f202ad67c1f887 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35998 – smb3: fix lock ordering potential deadlock in cifs_sync_mid_result
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35998
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb3: fix lock ordering potential deadlock in cifs_sync_mid_result Coverity spotted that the cifs_sync_mid_result function could deadlock "Thread deadlock (ORDER_REVERSAL) lock_order: Calling spin_lock acquires lock TCP_Server_Info.srv_lock while holding lock TCP_Server_Info.mid_lock" Addresses-Coverity: 1590401 ("Thread deadlock (ORDER_REVERSAL)") En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: smb3: corrige el posible interbloqueo en el orden de bloqueo en cifs_sync_mid_result Coverity detectó que la función cifs_sync_mid_result podría interbloquearse "Interbloqueo de subprocesos (ORDER_REVERSAL) lock_order: llamar a spin_lock adquiere el bloqueo TCP_Server_Info.srv_lock mientras mantiene el bloqueo TCP_Server_Info.mid_lock "Direcciones-Cobertura: 1590401 ("Estancamiento del hilo (ORDER_REVERSAL)") • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7a4bca289e50bb4b2650f845c41bb3e453f4c66 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/699f8958dece132709c0bff6a9700999a2a63b75 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8248224ab5b8ca7559b671917c224296a4d671fc https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8861fd5180476f45f9e8853db154600469a0284f •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35997 – HID: i2c-hid: remove I2C_HID_READ_PENDING flag to prevent lock-up
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35997
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: i2c-hid: remove I2C_HID_READ_PENDING flag to prevent lock-up The flag I2C_HID_READ_PENDING is used to serialize I2C operations. However, this is not necessary, because I2C core already has its own locking for that. More importantly, this flag can cause a lock-up: if the flag is set in i2c_hid_xfer() and an interrupt happens, the interrupt handler (i2c_hid_irq) will check this flag and return immediately without doing anything, then the interrupt handler will be invoked again in an infinite loop. Since interrupt handler is an RT task, it takes over the CPU and the flag-clearing task never gets scheduled, thus we have a lock-up. Delete this unnecessary flag. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: HID: i2c-hid: elimine el indicador I2C_HID_READ_PENDING para evitar el bloqueo. El indicador I2C_HID_READ_PENDING se utiliza para serializar operaciones I2C. Sin embargo, esto no es necesario, porque el núcleo I2C ya tiene su propio bloqueo para ello. Más importante aún, este indicador puede causar un bloqueo: si el indicador está configurado en i2c_hid_xfer() y ocurre una interrupción, el controlador de interrupciones (i2c_hid_irq) verificará este indicador y regresará inmediatamente sin hacer nada, entonces se invocará el controlador de interrupciones. nuevamente en un bucle infinito. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a200c3b9a40242652b5734630bdd0bcf3aca75f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21bfca822cfc1e71796124e93b46e0d9fa584401 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c448a9fd50f77e8fb9156ff64848aa4295eb3003 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5095b93021b899f54c9355bebf36d78854c33a22 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b65fb50e04a95eec34a9d1bc138454a98a5578d8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0561b65fbd53d3e788c5b0222d9112ca016fd6a1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29e94f295bad5be59cf4271a93e22cdcf5536722 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/418c5575d56410c6e186ab727bf32ae32 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-667: Improper Locking •