CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 4%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10860
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10860
perl-archive-zip is vulnerable to a directory traversal in Archive::Zip. It was found that the Archive::Zip module did not properly sanitize paths while extracting zip files. An attacker able to provide a specially crafted archive for processing could use this flaw to write or overwrite arbitrary files in the context of the perl interpreter. perl-archive-zip es vulnerable a salto de directorio en Archive::Zip. Se ha descubierto que el módulo Archivo::Zip no saneaba correctamente las rutas cuando se extraían archivos zip. Un atacante que pueda proporcionar un archivo especialmente manipulado para que se procese podría utilizar esta vulnerabilidad para escribir o sobrescribir archivos arbitrarios en el contexto del intérprete perl. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104580 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10860 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00032.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3703-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3703-2 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4300 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1152
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1152
libjpeg-turbo 1.5.90 is vulnerable to a denial of service vulnerability caused by a divide by zero when processing a crafted BMP image. libjpeg-turbo 1.5.90 es vulnerable a una denegación de servicio (DoS) provocada por una división entre cero al procesar una imagen BMP manipulada. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00015.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104543 https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/commit/43e84cff1bb2bd8293066f6ac4eb0df61ddddbc6 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00015.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00033.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3706-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3706-2 https://www.tenab • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 481EXPL: 0CVE-2018-3665 – Kernel: FPU state information leakage via lazy FPU restore
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3665
System software utilizing Lazy FP state restore technique on systems using Intel Core-based microprocessors may potentially allow a local process to infer data from another process through a speculative execution side channel. El software de sistema que emplea la técnica de restauración de estado Lazy FP en los sistemas que emplean microprocesadores de Intel Core podrían permitir que un proceso local infiera datos de otro proceso mediante un canal lateral de ejecución especulativa. A Floating Point Unit (FPU) state information leakage flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel saved and restored the FPU state during task switch. Linux kernels that follow the "Lazy FPU Restore" scheme are vulnerable to the FPU state information leakage issue. An unprivileged local attacker could use this flaw to read FPU state bits by conducting targeted cache side-channel attacks, similar to the Meltdown vulnerability disclosed earlier this year. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104460 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041124 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1852 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1944 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1170 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1190 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1CVE-2018-0495 – ROHNP: Key Extraction Side Channel in Multiple Crypto Libraries
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0495
Libgcrypt before 1.7.10 and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures that can be mitigated through the use of blinding during the signing process in the _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign function in cipher/ecc-ecdsa.c, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host. Libgcrypt en versiones anteriores a la 1.7.10 y versiones 1.8.x anteriores a la 1.8.3 permite un ataque de canal lateral por caché de memoria en las firmas ECDSA que se puede mitigar mediante el uso de la ocultación durante el proceso de firmado en la función _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign en cipher/ecc-ecdsa.c. Esto también se conoce como Return Of the Hidden Number Problem o ROHNP. Para descubrir una clave ECDSA, el atacante necesita acceso a la máquina local o a una máquina virtual diferente en el mismo host físico. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041144 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041147 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3221 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1296 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1297 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1543 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2237 https://dev.gnupg.org/T4011 https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git%3Ba=commit%3 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 4%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-0732 – Client DoS due to large DH parameter
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0732
During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o). • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104442 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041090 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2552 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2553 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3221 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1296 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1297 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ • CWE-320: Key Management Errors CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •