CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2008-3804
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-3804
Unspecified vulnerability in the Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Forwarding Infrastructure (MFI) in Cisco IOS 12.2 and 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via crafted packets for which the software path is used. Vulnerabilidad sin especificar en el Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Forwarding Infrastructure (MFI) en Cisco IOS v12.2 y v12.4, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria) a través de paquetes manipulados en los que la ruta del software es usada. • http://secunia.com/advisories/31990 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a014ac.shtml http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020934 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2670 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5619 •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2008-3800
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-3800
Unspecified vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and Unified Communications Manager 4.1 through 6.1, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or process reload) via unspecified valid SIP messages, aka Cisco Bug ID CSCsu38644, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3801 and CVE-2008-3802. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en la implementación de la Session Initiation Protocol en Cisco IOS v12.2 a la v12.4 y Unified Communications Manager v4.1 a la v6.1, cuando VoIP está configurada, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (reinicio de proceso o de dispositivo) a través de mensajes SIP válidos no especificados, también conocidos como "Cisco Bug ID CSCsu38644". Vulnerabilidad distinta de CVE-2008-3800 y CVE-2008-3802. • http://secunia.com/advisories/31990 http://secunia.com/advisories/32013 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a01562.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a0156a.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31367 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020939 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020942 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2670 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2671 https://oval.cisecurity.org/re •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2008-3801
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-3801
Unspecified vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and Unified Communications Manager 4.1 through 6.1, when VoIP is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or process reload) via unspecified valid SIP messages, aka Cisco Bug ID CSCsm46064, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3800 and CVE-2008-3802. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en la implementación de la Session Initiation Protocol en Cisco IOS v12.2 a la v12.4 y Unified Communications Manager v4.1 a la v6.1, cuando VoIP está configurada, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (reinicio de proceso o de dispositivo) a través de mensajes SIP válidos no especificados. Vulnerabilidad distinta de CVE-2008-3800 y CVE-2008-3802. • http://secunia.com/advisories/31990 http://secunia.com/advisories/32013 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a01562.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a0156a.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31367 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020939 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020942 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2670 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2671 https://oval.cisecurity.org/re •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 11%CPEs: 35EXPL: 3CVE-2008-1447 – BIND 9.4.1 < 9.4.2 - Remote DNS Cache Poisoning
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1447
The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft DNS in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2; and other implementations allow remote attackers to spoof DNS traffic via a birthday attack that uses in-bailiwick referrals to conduct cache poisoning against recursive resolvers, related to insufficient randomness of DNS transaction IDs and source ports, aka "DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability" or "the Kaminsky bug." El protocolo DNS, como es implementado en (1) BIND 8 y 9 en versiones anteriores a 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1 y 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft DNS en Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 y SP3 y Server 2003 SP1 y SP2; y otras implementaciones permiten a atacantes remotos suplantar el tráfico DNS a través de un ataque de un cumpleaños que usa referencias in-bailiwick para llevar a cabo un envenenamiento del caché contra resolutores recursivos, relacionado con la insifuciente aleatoriedad de la ID de la transacción DNS y los puertos de origen, vulnerabilidad también conocida como "DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability" o "the Kaminsky bug". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6122 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6130 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6123 ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2008-009.txt.asc http://blog.invisibledenizen.org/2008/07/kaminskys-dns-issue-accidentally-leaked.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494401 http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01523520 http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID • CWE-331: Insufficient Entropy •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 165EXPL: 2CVE-2008-0960 – SNMPv3 - HMAC Validation error Remote Authentication Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-0960
SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 through 2.0.0; (5) NetApp (aka Network Appliance) Data ONTAP 7.3RC1 and 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research before 16.2; (7) multiple Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE, and Nexus products; (8) Ingate Firewall 3.1.0 and later and SIParator 3.1.0 and later; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent 15.x; and possibly other products relies on the client to specify the HMAC length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass SNMP authentication via a length value of 1, which only checks the first byte. Una comprobación SNMPv3 HMAC en (1) Net-SNMP versión 5.2.x anterior a 5.2.4.1, versión 5.3.x anterior a 5.3.2.1 y versión 5.4.x anterior a 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) C-series versión 1.0.0 hasta 2.0.0 de Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC); (5) Data de NetApp (también se conoce como Network Appliance) ONTAP versiones 7.3RC1 y 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research versión anterior a 16.2; (7) múltiples productos Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE y Nexus; (8) Ingate Firewall versión 3.1.0 y posterior y SIParator versión 3.1.0 y posterior; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent versión 15.x; y posiblemente otros productos dependen del cliente para especificar la longitud del HMAC, lo que facilita que los atacantes remotos omitan la autenticación SNMP por medio de un valor de longitud de 1, que solo comprueba el primer byte. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5790 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2008//Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.ingate.com/pipermail/productinfo/2008/000021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-08/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127730470825399&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0528.html http://secunia.com/advisories/30574 http://secunia.com/advisories/30596 http://secunia.com/advisories/30612 http://secunia.c • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •