CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3195 – OpenSSL: X509_ATTRIBUTE memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3195
The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8391 – pcre: inefficient posix character class syntax check (8.38/16)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8391
The pcre_compile function in pcre_compile.c in PCRE before 8.38 mishandles certain [: nesting, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror. La función pcre_compile en pcre_compile.c en PCRE en versiones anteriores a 8.38 no maneja correctamente cierta anidación [: , lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una expresión regular manipulada, según lo demostrado por un objeto JavaScript RegExp encontrado por Konqueror. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/174931.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1025.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1023886 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82990 https:&#x • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3276 – openldap: incorrect multi-keyword mode cipherstring parsing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3276
The nss_parse_ciphers function in libraries/libldap/tls_m.c in OpenLDAP does not properly parse OpenSSL-style multi-keyword mode cipher strings, which might cause a weaker than intended cipher to be used and allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. La función nss_parse_ciphers en libraries/libldap/tls_m.c en OpenLDAP no analiza adecuadamente cadenas de cifrado en modo multiclave de estilo OpenSSL, lo que podría provocar el uso de un cifrado más débil que el previsto y permitir a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado a través de vectores desconocidos. A flaw was found in the way OpenLDAP parsed OpenSSL-style cipher strings. As a result, OpenLDAP could potentially use ciphers that were not intended to be enabled. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2131.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034221 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238322 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3276 • CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2015-7837 – kernel: securelevel disabled after kexec
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7837
The Linux kernel, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, kernel-rt, and Enterprise MRG 2 and when booted with UEFI Secure Boot enabled, allows local users to bypass intended securelevel/secureboot restrictions by leveraging improper handling of secure_boot flag across kexec reboot. El kernel de Linux, tal y como se emplea en Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, kernel-rt y Enterprise MRG 2 y cuando se emplea con UEFI Secure Boot habilitado, permite que usuarios locales omitan las restricciones securelevel/secureboot previstas aprovechando la gestión incorrecta de la marca secure_boot cuando se reinicia kexec. A flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel handled the securelevel functionality after performing a kexec operation. A local attacker could use this flaw to bypass the security mechanism of the securelevel/secureboot combination. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2152.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2411.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/15/6 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77097 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272472 https://github.com/mjg59/linux/commit/4b2b64d5a6ebc84214755ebccd599baef7c1b798 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7837 • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 62EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8126 – libpng: Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in png_get_PLTE/png_set_PLTE functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8126
Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) png_set_PLTE and (2) png_get_PLTE functions in libpng before 1.0.64, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.54, 1.3.x and 1.4.x before 1.4.17, 1.5.x before 1.5.24, and 1.6.x before 1.6.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer en las funciones (1) png_set_PLTE y (2) png_get_PLTE en libpng en versiones anteriores a 1.0.64, 1.1.x y 1.2.x en versiones anteriores a 1.2.54, 1.3.x y 1.4.x en versiones anteriores a 1.4.17, 1.5.x en versiones anteriores a 1.5.24 y 1.6.x en versiones anteriores a 1.6.19 permiten a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de un valor bit-depth pequeño en un fragmento IHDR (también conocido como image header) en una imagen PNG. It was discovered that the png_get_PLTE() and png_set_PLTE() functions of libpng did not correctly calculate the maximum palette sizes for bit depths of less than 8. In case an application tried to use these functions in combination with properly calculated palette sizes, this could lead to a buffer overflow or out-of-bounds reads. An attacker could exploit this to cause a crash or potentially execute arbitrary code by tricking an unsuspecting user into processing a specially crafted PNG image. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/03/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172324.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172620.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172647.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/172663.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •