CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2014-9761 – glibc: Unbounded stack allocation in nan* functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9761
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (1) nan, (2) nanf, or (3) nanl function. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permiten a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbirario a través de un argumento largo en la función (1) nan, (2) nanf o (3) nanl. A stack overflow vulnerability was found in nan* functions that could cause applications, which process long strings with the nan function, to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Many Cisco devices such as Cisco RV340, Cisco RV340W, Cisco RV345, Cisco RV345P, Cisco RV260, Cisco RV260P, Cisco RV260W, Cisco 160, and Cisco 160W suffer from having hard-coded credentials, known GNU glibc, known BusyBox, and IoT Inspector identified vulnerabilities. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153278/WAGO-852-Industria • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8778 – glibc: Integer overflow in hcreate and hcreate_r
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8778
Integer overflow in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via the size argument to the __hcreate_r function, which triggers out-of-bounds heap-memory access. Desbordamiento de entero en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través del argumento size a la función the __hcreate_r, lo que desencandena el acceso fuera de rango a memoria dinámica. An integer overflow vulnerability was found in hcreate() and hcreate_r() functions which could result in an out-of-bounds memory access. This could lead to application crash or, potentially, arbitrary code execution. Many Cisco devices such as Cisco RV340, Cisco RV340W, Cisco RV345, Cisco RV345P, Cisco RV260, Cisco RV260P, Cisco RV260W, Cisco 160, and Cisco 160W suffer from having hard-coded credentials, known GNU glibc, known BusyBox, and IoT Inspector identified vulnerabilities. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154361/Cisco-Device-Hardc • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2015-8776 – glibc: Segmentation fault caused by passing out-of-range data to strftime()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8776
The strftime function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly obtain sensitive information via an out-of-range time value. La función strftime en la GNU C Library (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente obtener información sensible a través de un valor de tiempo fuera de rango. It was found that out-of-range time values passed to the strftime() function could result in an out-of-bounds memory access. This could lead to application crash or, potentially, information disclosure. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184626.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0680.html http&# • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2015-0192 – JDK: unspecified Java sandbox restrictions bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-0192
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en IBM Java 8 anterior a SR1, 7 R1 anterior a SR2 FP11, 7 anterior a SR9, 6 R1 anterior a SR8 FP4, 6 anterior a SR16 FP4, y 5.0 anterior a SR16 FP10 permite a atacantes remotos ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Java Virtual Machine. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1006.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1007.html http://rhn.redhat.com&#x •