Page 45 of 309 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 43%CPEs: 74EXPL: 1

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the self_link function in in the RSS Feed Generator (wp-includes/feed.php) for WordPress before 2.6.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Host header (HTTP_HOST variable). Vulnerabilidad de secuencias de comandos en sitios cruzados (XSS) en la función self_link en el RSS Feed Generator (wp-includes/feed.php) para WordPress versiones anteriores a v2.6.5 permite a atacantes remotos inyectar web script o HTML de su elección a través de una cabecera Host (variable HTTP_HOST). • http://osvdb.org/50214 http://secunia.com/advisories/32882 http://secunia.com/advisories/32966 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4662 http://wordpress.org/development/2008/11/wordpress-265 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498652 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32476 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46882 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg00000.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg00 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

WordPress 2.6.3 relies on the REQUEST superglobal array in certain dangerous situations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct delayed and persistent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via crafted cookies, as demonstrated by attacks that (1) delete user accounts or (2) cause a denial of service (loss of application access). NOTE: this issue relies on the presence of an independent vulnerability that allows cookie injection. WordPress 2.6.3 se basa en el array superglobal REQUEST en algunas situaciones peligrosas, lo cual facilita a los atacantes remotos a llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de petición en sitios cruzados tanto persistentes como retardados a través de "cookies" modificadas a mano, como lo demuestran los ataques que (1) eliminan cuentas de usuario o (2) provocan una denegación de servicio (pérdida de acceso a la aplicación). NOTA: Este problema se basa en la presencia de una vulnerabilidad independiente que permite la inyección de cookies. • http://bugs.debian.org/504771 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/14/1 http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1871 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46698 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

The _httpsrequest function (Snoopy/Snoopy.class.php) in Snoopy 1.2.3 and earlier, as used in (1) ampache, (2) libphp-snoopy, (3) mahara, (4) mediamate, (5) opendb, (6) pixelpost, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in https URLs. La función _httpsrequest function (Snoopy/Snoopy.class.php) en Snoopy 1.2.3 y versiones anteriores, cuando es usada en (1) ampache, (2) libphp-snoopy, (3) mahara, (4) mediamate, (5) opendb, (6) pixelpost y posiblemente otros productos, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a través de metacarácteres shell en URLs https. Feed2JS uses MagpieRSS for parsing the feeds, and MagpieRSS uses Snoopy library for fetching the documents. The version of Snoopy in use suffers from a local file disclosure vulnerability. • http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN20502807/index.html http://jvndb.jvn.jp/ja/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-000074.html http://secunia.com/advisories/32361 http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=879959 http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1691 http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1871 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/01/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496068/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31887 http://www.vupen • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 34EXPL: 2

WordPress before 2.6.2 does not properly handle MySQL warnings about insertion of username strings that exceed the maximum column width of the user_login column, and does not properly handle space characters when comparing usernames, which allows remote attackers to change an arbitrary user's password to a random value by registering a similar username and then requesting a password reset, related to a "SQL column truncation vulnerability." NOTE: the attacker can discover the random password by also exploiting CVE-2008-4107. WordPress anterior a v2.6.2 no maneja adecuadamente las advertencias MySQL relacionadas con la inserción de nombres de usuarios con un tamaño superior al ancho de la columna del user_login, y no maneja correctamente los espacios a la hora de comparar nombres de usuario, lo que permite a atacantes remotos modificar las contraseñas de usuarios de su elección a un valor aleatorio registrando un nombre de usuario similar y posteriormente realizando un reinicio de contraseña, relacionado con la "Vulnerabilidad de truncado de columna SQL" (SQL column truncation vulnerability). NOTA: el atacante puede descubrir la contraseña aleatoria explotando la vulnerabilidad CVE-2008-4107. • http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=122152830017099&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/31737 http://secunia.com/advisories/31870 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4272 http://securitytracker.com/id?1020869 http://wordpress.org/development/2008/09/wordpress-262 http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1871 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/11/6 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496287/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31068 http: • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-197: Numeric Truncation Error •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0

The (1) get_edit_post_link and (2) get_edit_comment_link functions in wp-includes/link-template.php in WordPress before 2.6.1 do not force SSL communication in the intended situations, which might allow remote attackers to gain administrative access by sniffing the network for a cookie. Las funciones (1) get_edit_post_link y (2) get_edit_comment_link en wp-includes/link-template.php de WordPress antes de 2.6.1 no fuerzan comunicación SSL en las situaciones previstas, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos obtener acceso administrativo siguiendo la red para una cookie. • http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/7359 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/08/19/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/08/20/3 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30750 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44569 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •