CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 14EXPL: 1CVE-2018-12015 – perl: Directory traversal in Archive::Tar
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12015
In Perl through 5.26.2, the Archive::Tar module allows remote attackers to bypass a directory-traversal protection mechanism, and overwrite arbitrary files, via an archive file containing a symlink and a regular file with the same name. En Perl hasta la versión 5.26.2, el módulo Archive::Tar permite que atacantes remotos omitan un mecanismo de protección de salto de directorio y sobrescriban archivos arbitrarios mediante un archivo comprimido que contiene un symlink y un archivo normal con el mismo nombre. It was found that the Archive::Tar module did not properly sanitize symbolic links when extracting tar archives. An attacker, able to provide a specially crafted archive for processing, could use this flaw to write or overwrite arbitrary files in the context of the Perl interpreter. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Mar/49 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104423 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041048 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2097 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900834 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Mar/42 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180927-0001 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT209600 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3684-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3684-2 https://www.debian.org/security/2018& • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 3CVE-2018-1123 – Procps-ng - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1123
procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to a denial of service in ps via mmap buffer overflow. Inbuilt protection in ps maps a guard page at the end of the overflowed buffer, ensuring that the impact of this flaw is limited to a crash (temporary denial of service). procps-ng en versiones anteriores a la 3.3.15 es vulnerable a una denegación de servicio (DoS) en ps mediante un desbordamiento de búfer en mmap. La protección incluida en ps mapea una página guard al final del búfer desbordado, asegurando que el impacto de este error se limita a un cierre inesperado (denegación de servicio temporal). Qualys performed an extensive audit of procps-ng. They discovered hundreds of bugs and vulnerabilities. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44806 https://github.com/aravinddathd/CVE-2018-1123 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00059.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104214 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1123 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1CVE-2018-1125 – Procps-ng Audit Report
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1125
procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to a stack buffer overflow in pgrep. This vulnerability is mitigated by FORTIFY, as it involves strncat() to a stack-allocated string. When pgrep is compiled with FORTIFY (as on Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora), the impact is limited to a crash. procps-ng en versiones anteriores a la 3.3.15 es vulnerable a un desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en pgrep. Esta vulnerabilidad se mitiga mediante FORTIFY, ya que implica el uso de strncat() en una cadena asignada a la pila. Cuando pgrep se compila con FORTIFY (como en Red Hat Enterprise Linux y Fedora), el impacto se limita a un cierre inesperado. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00059.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104214 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1125 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/05/msg00021.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3658-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3658-3 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4208 https:/ • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 2CVE-2018-1122 – Procps-ng - Multiple Vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1122
procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in top. If a user runs top with HOME unset in an attacker-controlled directory, the attacker could achieve privilege escalation by exploiting one of several vulnerabilities in the config_file() function. procps-ng en versiones anteriores a la 3.3.15 es vulnerable a un escalado de privilegios locales en top. Si un usuario ejecuta top sin establecer HOME en un directorio controlado por el atacante, este podría lograr el escalado de privilegios explotando una de las varias vulnerabilidades existentes en la función config_file(). If the HOME environment variable is unset or empty, top will read its configuration file from the current working directory without any security check. If a user runs top with HOME unset in an attacker-controlled directory, the attacker could achieve privilege escalation by exploiting one of several vulnerabilities in the config_file() function. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44806 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00059.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/122 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104214 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2189 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0595 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1122 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/ • CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •