CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1283 – httpd: Improper handling of headers in mod_session can allow a remote user to modify session data for CGI applications
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1283
In Apache httpd 2.4.0 to 2.4.29, when mod_session is configured to forward its session data to CGI applications (SessionEnv on, not the default), a remote user may influence their content by using a "Session" header. This comes from the "HTTP_SESSION" variable name used by mod_session to forward its data to CGIs, since the prefix "HTTP_" is also used by the Apache HTTP Server to pass HTTP header fields, per CGI specifications. En Apache httpd, versiones 2.4.0 hasta la 2.4.29, cuando se configura mod_session para que reenvíe sus datos de sesión a aplicaciones CGI (SessionEnv habilitado, no por defecto), un usuario remoto podría influir en su contenido empleando una cabecera "Session". Esto viene del nombre de variable "HTTP_SESSION", empleado por mod_session para reenviar sus datos a interfaces de entrada común (CGI), dado que el prefijo "HTTP_" también es utilizado por el servidor Apache HTTP para pasar sus campos de cabecera HTTP, por especificaciones CGI. It has been discovered that the mod_session module of Apache HTTP Server (httpd), through version 2.4.29, has an improper input validation flaw in the way it handles HTTP session headers in some configurations. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/03/24/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103520 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040568 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.ht • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8088 – slf4j: Deserialisation vulnerability in EventData constructor can allow for arbitrary code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8088
org.slf4j.ext.EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J before 1.8.0-beta2 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted data. EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J, has been fixed in SLF4J versions 1.7.26 later and in the 2.0.x series. org.slf4j.ext.EventData en el módulo slf4j-ext en QOS.CH SLF4J antes de la versión 1.8.0-beta2 permite a los atacantes remotos saltarse las restricciones de acceso previstas a través de datos manipulados. EventData en el módulo slf4j-ext en QOS.CH SLF4J, ha sido corregido en las versiones 1.7.26 posteriores de SLF4J y en la serie 2.0.x An XML deserialization vulnerability was discovered in slf4j's EventData, which accepts an XML serialized string and can lead to arbitrary code execution. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103737 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040627 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0582 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0592 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0627 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0628 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0629 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0630 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1247 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1248 https: • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 23EXPL: 2CVE-2018-7750 – Paramiko 2.4.1 - Authentication Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-7750
transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step. transport.py en la implementación del servidor SSH de Paramiko, en versiones anteriores a la 1.17.6; versiones 1.18.x anteriores a la 1.18.5; versiones 2.0.x anteriores a la 2.0.8; versiones 2.1.x anteriores a la 2.1.5; versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.3; versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.2 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.1, no comprueba adecuadamente si la autenticación se ha completado antes de procesar otras peticiones, tal y como demuestra channel-open. Un cliente SSH personalizado puede simplemente omitir el paso de autenticación. It was found that when acting as an SSH server, paramiko did not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client could use this to bypass authentication when accessing any resources controlled by paramiko. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45712 https://github.com/jm33-m0/CVE-2018-7750 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0646 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1124 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1213 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1274 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1328 https:&#x • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 51EXPL: 1CVE-2018-1304 – tomcat: Incorrect handling of empty string URL in security constraints can lead to unintended exposure of resources
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1304
The URL pattern of "" (the empty string) which exactly maps to the context root was not correctly handled in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4, 8.5.0 to 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.84 when used as part of a security constraint definition. This caused the constraint to be ignored. It was, therefore, possible for unauthorised users to gain access to web application resources that should have been protected. Only security constraints with a URL pattern of the empty string were affected. El patrón de URL "" (la cadena vacía) que mapea exactamente al root de contexto no se gestionó correctamente en Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.4, 8.5.0 a 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.49 y 7.0.0 a 7.0.84 al emplearse como parte de una definición de limitación de seguridad. • https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-1304 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103170 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040427 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0465 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1320 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1447 https://access.redha • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12174 – artemis/hornetq: memory exhaustion via UDP and JGroups discovery
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12174
It was found that when Artemis and HornetQ before 2.4.0 are configured with UDP discovery and JGroups discovery a huge byte array is created when receiving an unexpected multicast message. This may result in a heap memory exhaustion, full GC, or OutOfMemoryError. Se ha descubierto que cuando Artemis y HornetQ, en versiones anteriores a la 2.4.0, se configuran con detección UDP y detección JGroups, se crea un array con muchos bytes al recibir un mensaje multicast inesperado. Esto podría resultar en un agotamiento de la memoria dinámica (heap), GC completo o OutOfMemoryError. It was found that when Artemis and HornetQ are configured with UDP discovery and JGroups discovery a huge byte array is created when receiving an unexpected multicast message. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0268 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0269 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0270 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0271 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0275 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0480 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0481 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug. • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •