CVE-2009-2051
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-2051
Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 4.x, 5.x before 5.1(3g), 6.x before 6.1(4), and 7.x before 7.1(2) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or voice-services outage) via a malformed SIP INVITE message that triggers an improper call to the sipSafeStrlen function, aka Bug IDs CSCsz40392 and CSCsz43987. Cisco Unified Communications Manager (también conocido como CUCM, formalmente CallManager) v4.x, v5.x anteriores a v5.1(3g), v6.x anteriores v6.1(4), y v7.x anteriores v7.1(2) permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (parada del servicio de voz) a través de mensajes malformados SIP INVITE que lanzan una llamada incorrecta a la función sipSafeStrlen, también conocida como Bug ID CSCsz40392. • http://osvdb.org/57453 http://secunia.com/advisories/36498 http://secunia.com/advisories/36499 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af2d11.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b4a30f.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36152 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022775 •
CVE-2008-4609
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-4609
The TCP implementation in (1) Linux, (2) platforms based on BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) Cisco products, and probably other operating systems allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection queue exhaustion) via multiple vectors that manipulate information in the TCP state table, as demonstrated by sockstress. La implementación del protocolo TCP en (1) Linux, (2) plataformas basadas en BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) productos Cisco, y probablemente otros sistemas operativos, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (agotamiento de cola de conexión) a través de múltiples vectores que manipulan información en la tabla de estados del TCP, como lo demuestra sockstress. • http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/conjecture-speculation.html http://insecure.org/stf/tcp-dos-attack-explained.html http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2008-October/005360.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=125856010926699&w=2 http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/articles/27154-TCP-is-fundamentally-borked http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af511d.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a15120.html http://www.cpni • CWE-16: Configuration •
CVE-2007-5381 – Cisco IOS 12.3 - 'LPD' Remote Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-5381
Stack-based buffer overflow in the Line Printer Daemon (LPD) in Cisco IOS before 12.2(18)SXF11, 12.4(16a), and 12.4(2)T6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by setting a long hostname on the target system, then causing an error message to be printed, as demonstrated by a telnet session to the LPD from a source port other than 515. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en Line Printer Daemon (LPD) en Cisco IOS anterior a 12.2(18)SXF11, 12.4(16a), y 12.4(2)T6 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de la configuración de un nombre de host largo sobre el sistema objetivo, lo cual hace que se muestre un mensaje de error, como se demostró con la sesión de telnet en el LPD desde un puerto fuente a otro que 515. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30652 http://osvdb.org/37935 http://secunia.com/advisories/27169 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a00808d72e3.html http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/155-Advisory-024 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/230505 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26001 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018798 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3457 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37046 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •