CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 78EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5743 – Limiting simultaneous TCP clients was ineffective
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5743
By design, BIND is intended to limit the number of TCP clients that can be connected at any given time. The number of allowed connections is a tunable parameter which, if unset, defaults to a conservative value for most servers. Unfortunately, the code which was intended to limit the number of simultaneous connections contained an error which could be exploited to grow the number of simultaneous connections beyond this limit. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.6, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3, and 9.11.5-S5. • https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5743 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K74009656?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_20 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5743 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702541 • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 351EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6609
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6609
Platform dependent weakness. This issue only impacts iSeries platforms. On these platforms, in BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator) versions 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.3, and 12.1.1 HF2-12.1.4, the secureKeyCapable attribute was not set which causes secure vault to not use the F5 hardware support to store the unit key. Instead the unit key is stored in plaintext on disk as would be the case for Z100 systems. Additionally this causes the unit key to be stored in UCS files taken on these platforms. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K18535734 • CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6600
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6600
In BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.7, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, or 11.5.1-11.5.8, when remote authentication is enabled for administrative users and all external users are granted the "guest" role, unsanitized values can be reflected to the client via the login page. This can lead to a cross-site scripting attack against unauthenticated clients. En BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.7, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, o 11.5.1-11.5.8, cuando la autenticación remota está habilitada para usuarios administrativos y a todos los usuarios se les otorga el rol "guest", los valores no saneados pueden devolverse al cliente mediante la página de inicio de sesión. Esto puede conducir a un ataque de Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) contra clientes no autenticados. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107470 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K23734425 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 66EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6598
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6598
In BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, or 11.5.1-11.5.8 or Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, malformed requests to the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the BIG-IP Configuration utility, may lead to disruption of TMUI services. This attack requires an authenticated user with any role (other than the No Access role). The No Access user role cannot login and does not have the access level to perform the attack. En BIG-IP, 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.1-11.6.3.2, o 11.5.1-11.5.8 o Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, las peticiones mal formadas al TMUI (Traffic Management User Interface), también llamado utilidad BIG-IP Configuration, podría conducir a la interrupción de los servicios TMUI. Este ataque requiere un usuario autenticado con cualquier rol (aparte del rol "No Access"). • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44603900 •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 91EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6594
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6594
On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.6.3.2, 12.1.3.4-12.1.3.7, 13.0.0 HF1-13.1.1.1, and 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, Multi-Path TCP (MPTCP) does not protect against multiple zero length DATA_FINs in the reassembly queue, which can lead to an infinite loop in some circumstances. BIG-IP, en sus versiones 11.5.1-11.6.3.2, 12.1.3.4-12.1.3.7, 13.0.0 HF1-13.1.1.1 y 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, Multi-Path TCP (MPTCP), no protege contra manera correcta contra múltiples DATA_FIN de longitud cero en la cola de reensamblado, lo que podría conducir a un bucle infinito en algunas circunstancias. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K91026261 • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •