CVSS: 8.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1CVE-2022-0393 – Out-of-bounds Read in vim/vim
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-0393
Out-of-bounds Read in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2. Una Lectura Fuera de Límites en Conda vim versiones anteriores a 8.2 • https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/a4bc2dd7cccf5a4a9f78b58b6f35a45d17164323 https://huntr.dev/bounties/ecc8f488-01a0-477f-848f-e30b8e524bba https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZLEHVP4LNAGER4ZDGUDS5V5YVQD6INF https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UFXFAILMLUIK4MBUEZO4HNBNKYZRJ5AP https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-32 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23990 – expat: integer overflow in the doProlog function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23990
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has an integer overflow in the doProlog function. Expat (también se conoce como libexpat) versiones anteriores a 2.4.4, presenta un desbordamiento de enteros en la función doProlog A flaw was found in expat. The vulnerability occurs due to large content in element type declarations when there is an element declaration handler present which leads to an integer overflow. This flaw allows an attacker to inject an unsigned integer, leading to a crash or a denial of service. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-484086.pdf https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/551 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/34NXVL2RZC2YZRV74ZQ3RNFB7WCEUP7D https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R7FF2UH7MPXKTADYSJUAHI2Y5UHBSHUH https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-24 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5073 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2021-22570 – Nullptr Dereference in Protobuf
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22570
Nullptr dereference when a null char is present in a proto symbol. The symbol is parsed incorrectly, leading to an unchecked call into the proto file's name during generation of the resulting error message. Since the symbol is incorrectly parsed, the file is nullptr. We recommend upgrading to version 3.15.0 or greater. Una desreferencia de puntero Null cuando un char nulo está presente en un símbolo proto. • https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.15.0 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00019.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3DVUZPALAQ34TQP6KFNLM4IZS6B32XSA https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5PAGL5M2KGYPN3VEQCRJJE6NA7D5YG5X https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTRGBRC5KGCA4SK5MUNLPYJRAGXMBIYY https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archi • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2021-45079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45079
In strongSwan before 5.9.5, a malicious responder can send an EAP-Success message too early without actually authenticating the client and (in the case of EAP methods with mutual authentication and EAP-only authentication for IKEv2) even without server authentication. En strongSwan versiones anteriores a 5.9.5, un respondedor malicioso puede enviar un mensaje EAP-Success demasiado pronto sin autenticar realmente al cliente y (en el caso de los métodos EAP con autenticación mutua y autenticación sólo EAP para IKEv2) incluso sin autenticación del servidor • https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2022/01/24/strongswan-vulnerability-%28cve-2021-45079%29.html • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23035
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23035
Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest's use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid. Un saneo insuficiente de las IRQs de dispositivos pasados. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt • CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup •