CVE-2024-35799 – drm/amd/display: Prevent crash when disable stream
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35799
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Prevent crash when disable stream [Why] Disabling stream encoder invokes a function that no longer exists. [How] Check if the function declaration is NULL in disable stream encoder. En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/amd/display: evita fallos al deshabilitar la transmisión [Por qué] Al deshabilitar el codificador de transmisión se invoca una función que ya no existe. [Cómo] Compruebe si la declaración de función es NULL al desactivar el codificador de flujo. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4356a2c3f296503c8b420ae8adece053960a9f06 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59772327d439874095516673b4b30c48bd83ca38 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b17133a0a2e0e111803124dad09e803718d4a48 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/72d72e8fddbcd6c98e1b02d32cf6f2b04e10bd1c • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVE-2024-35798 – btrfs: fix race in read_extent_buffer_pages()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35798
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race in read_extent_buffer_pages() There are reports from tree-checker that detects corrupted nodes, without any obvious pattern so possibly an overwrite in memory. After some debugging it turns out there's a race when reading an extent buffer the uptodate status can be missed. To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer, read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks: /* (1) */ if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags)) return 0; /* (2) */ if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags)) goto done; At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does /* (3) */ set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb); /* (4) */ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags); Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is a racey interleaving: Thread A | Thread B | Thread C ---------+----------+--------- (1) | | | (1) | (2) | | (3) | | (4) | | | (2) | | | (1) When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if it's been set, skip the unnecessary read. [ minor update of changelog ] En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: btrfs: corrige la ejecución en read_extent_buffer_pages() Hay informes de tree-checker que detecta nodos corruptos, sin ningún patrón obvio por lo que posiblemente se sobrescriba en la memoria. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7172f52e9933b6ec9305e7fe6e829e3939dba04 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0427c8ef8bbb7f304de42ef51d69c960e165e052 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a25878a3378adce5d846300c9570f15aa7f7a80 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2885d54af2c2e1d910e20d5c8045bae40e02fbc1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef1e68236b9153c27cb7cf29ead0c532870d4215 •
CVE-2024-35797 – mm: cachestat: fix two shmem bugs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35797
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: cachestat: fix two shmem bugs When cachestat on shmem races with swapping and invalidation, there are two possible bugs: 1) A swapin error can have resulted in a poisoned swap entry in the shmem inode's xarray. Calling get_shadow_from_swap_cache() on it will result in an out-of-bounds access to swapper_spaces[]. Validate the entry with non_swap_entry() before going further. 2) When we find a valid swap entry in the shmem's inode, the shadow entry in the swapcache might not exist yet: swap IO is still in progress and we're before __remove_mapping; swapin, invalidation, or swapoff have removed the shadow from swapcache after we saw the shmem swap entry. This will send a NULL to workingset_test_recent(). The latter purely operates on pointer bits, so it won't crash - node 0, memcg ID 0, eviction timestamp 0, etc. are all valid inputs - but it's a bogus test. In theory that could result in a false "recently evicted" count. Such a false positive wouldn't be the end of the world. But for code clarity and (future) robustness, be explicit about this case. Bail on get_shadow_from_swap_cache() returning NULL. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf264e1329fb0307e044f7675849f9f38b44c11a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b79f9e1ff27c994a4c452235ba09e672ec698e23 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d962f6c583458037dc7e529659b2b02b9dd3d94b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/24a0e73d544439bb9329fbbafac44299e548a677 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5d39c707a4cf0bcc84680178677b97aa2cb2627 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-35797 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281151 •
CVE-2024-35796 – net: ll_temac: platform_get_resource replaced by wrong function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35796
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ll_temac: platform_get_resource replaced by wrong function The function platform_get_resource was replaced with devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname and is called using 0 as name. This eventually ends up in platform_get_resource_byname in the call stack, where it causes a null pointer in strcmp. if (type == resource_type(r) && !strcmp(r->name, name)) It should have been replaced with devm_platform_ioremap_resource. En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net:ll_temac: platform_get_resource reemplazada por una función incorrecta La función platform_get_resource fue reemplazada por devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname y se llama usando 0 como nombre. Esto eventualmente termina en platform_get_resource_byname en la pila de llamadas, donde genera un puntero null en strcmp. if (type == Resource_type(r) && !strcmp(r->name, name)) Debería haber sido reemplazado por devm_platform_ioremap_resource. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd69058f50d5ffa659423bcfa6fe6280ce9c760a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77c8cfdf808410be84be56aff7e0e186b8c5a879 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d9395ba7f85bdb7af0b93272e537484ecbeff48 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/553d294db94b5f139378022df480a9fb6c3ae39e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46efbdbc95a30951c2579caf97b6df2ee2b3bef3 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/476eed5f1c22034774902a980aa48dc4662cb39a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e9edb569fd9f688d887e36db8170f6e22bafbc8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92c0c29f667870f17c0b764544bdf22ce •
CVE-2024-35795 – drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35795
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs An errant disk backup on my desktop got into debugfs and triggered the following deadlock scenario in the amdgpu debugfs files. The machine also hard-resets immediately after those lines are printed (although I wasn't able to reproduce that part when reading by hand): [ 1318.016074][ T1082] ====================================================== [ 1318.016607][ T1082] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 Not tainted [ 1318.017598][ T1082] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.019084][ T1082] [ 1318.019084][ T1082] but task is already holding lock: [ 1318.020052][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 1318.023083][ T1082] [ 1318.023083][ T1082] -> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 1318.024114][ T1082] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0 [ 1318.024639][ T1082] ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 1318.025161][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x18a/0x330 [ 1318.025683][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.026210][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.026728][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.027242][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.027759][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.028281][ T1082] [ 1318.028281][ T1082] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 1318.029297][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330 [ 1318.029790][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.030263][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.030722][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.031168][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.031598][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.032011][ T1082] [ 1318.032011][ T1082] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 1318.032778][ T1082] __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680 [ 1318.033141][ T1082] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0 [ 1318.033487][ T1082] __might_fault+0x58/0x80 [ 1318.033814][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.034181][ T1082] full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80 [ 1318.034487][ T1082] vfs_read+0xa7/0x360 [ 1318.034788][ T1082] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0 [ 1318.035085][ T1082] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180 [ 1318.035375][ T1082] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.035664][ T1082] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.036487][ T1082] Chain exists of: [ 1318.036487][ T1082] &mm->mmap_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [ 1318.036487][ T1082] [ 1318.037310][ T1082] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1318.037310][ T1082] [ 1318.037838][ T1082] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1318.038101][ T1082] ---- ---- [ 1318.038350][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.038590][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [ 1318.038839][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.039083][ T1082] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.039328][ T1082] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 lock held by tar/1082: [ 1318.040259][ T1082] #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] stack backtrace: [ ---truncated--- En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/amdgpu: corrige el punto muerto al leer mqd desde debugfs Una copia de seguridad de disco errónea en mi escritorio entró en debugfs y desencadenó el siguiente escenario de punto muerto en los archivos amdgpu debugfs. La máquina también se reinicia inmediatamente después de imprimir esas líneas (aunque no pude reproducir esa parte cuando leí a mano): [ 1318.016074][ T1082] =============== ======================================= [ 1318.016607][ T1082] ADVERTENCIA: posible bloqueo circular dependencia detectada [ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 No contaminado [ 1318.017598][ T1082] ----------------------- ------------------------------- [ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 está intentando adquirir el bloqueo: [ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, en: __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.019084][ T1082] [ 1318.019084][ T1082] pero la tarea ya mantiene el bloqueo: [ 1318.020052 ][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] el bloqueo ya depende del nuevo cerrar con llave. [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: [ 1318.023083][ T1082] [ 1318.023083][ T1082] -> #2 (reservation_ww_ clase_mutex){+ .+.}-{3:3}: [ 1318.024114][ T1082] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0 [ 1318.024639][ T1082] ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 1318.025161][ T1082] dep+0x18a/0x330 [ 1318.025683 ][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.026210][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.026728][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.027242][ T1082] from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.027759][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+ 0x11/0x20 [ 1318.028281][ T1082] [ 1318.028281][ T1082] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 1318.029297][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330 [ 1 318.029790][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.030263][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.030722][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.031168][ T1082] bifurcación+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.031598][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/ 0x20 [ 1318.032011][ T1082] [ 1318.032011][ T1082] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 1318.032778][ T1082] __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680 [ 1318.033141 ] [ T1082] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0 [ 1318.033487][ T1082] __might_fault+0x58/0x80 [ 1318.033814][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.03418 1][T1082] lectura_proxy_completa+0x55/0x80 [1318.034487][T1082] vfs_read+0xa7/0x360 [ 1318.034788][ T1082] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0 [ 1318.035085][ T1082] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180 [ 1318.035375][ T1082] wframe+0x46/0x4e [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.035664][ T1082] Otra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto: [1318.035664] [T1082] [1318.036487] [T1082] La cadena existe de: [1318.036487] [T1082] & mm-> mmap_lock-> reservation_ww_class_acquire-> reservación_www_mutex. ] [ 1318.037310][T1082] Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: [ 1318.037310][ T1082] [ 1318.037838][ T1082] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1318.038101][ T1082] ---- ---- [ 1318.038350][ T1082] _class_mutex); [ 1318.038590][ T1082] bloqueo(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [ 1318.038839][ T1082] bloqueo(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.039083][ T1082] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.039328][ T1082] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 bloqueo retenido por tar/1082: [ 1318.040259][ T1082] #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 ( reserve_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] seguimiento de pila: [ ---truncado--- • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/445d85e3c1dfd8c45b24be6f1527f1e117256d0e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/197f6d6987c55860f6eea1c93e4f800c59078874 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b03556da6e576c62664b6cd01809e4a09d53b5b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4687e3c6ee877ee25e57b984eca00be53b9a8db5 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8678b1060ae2b75feb60b87e5b75e17374e3c1c5 •