CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1CVE-2020-11996 – tomcat: specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests can lead to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11996
A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests sent to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M5, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.35 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.55 could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive. Una secuencia especialmente diseñada de peticiones HTTP/2 enviadas a Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M5, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.35 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.55, podría desencadenar un uso elevado de la CPU por varios segundos. Si se hacen una cantidad suficiente de tales peticiones en conexiones HTTP/2 concurrentes, el servidor podría dejar de responder • https://github.com/rusakovichma/tomcat-embed-core-9.0.31-CVE-2020-11996 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00064.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00072.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2529016c311ce9485e6f173446d469600fdfbb94dccadfcd9dfdac79%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3ea96d8f36dd404acce83df8aeb22a9e807d6c13ca9c5dec72f872cd%40%3Cnotifications.ofbiz.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5541ef6b6b68b49f76fc4c45695940116da2b • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 91%CPEs: 77EXPL: 12CVE-2020-9484 – tomcat: deserialization flaw in session persistence storage leading to RCE
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-9484
When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. Cuando se usa Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.34, 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.54 y 7.0.0 hasta 7.0. 103, si a) un atacante es capaz de controlar el contenido y el nombre de un archivo en el servidor; y b) el servidor está configurado para usar el PersistenceManager con un FileStore; y c) el PersistenceManager está configurado con sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (el valor predeterminado a menos que se utilice un SecurityManager) o un filtro lo suficientemente laxo como para permitir que el objeto proporcionado por el atacante sea deserializado; y d) el atacante conoce la ruta relativa del archivo desde la ubicación de almacenamiento usada por FileStore hasta el archivo sobre el que el atacante presenta control; entonces, mediante una petición específicamente diseñada, el atacante podrá ser capaz de desencadenar una ejecución de código remota mediante la deserialización del archivo bajo su control. Tome en cuenta que todas las condiciones desde la a) hasta la d) deben cumplirse para que el ataque tenga éxito. A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. • https://github.com/masahiro331/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/IdealDreamLast/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/osamahamad/CVE-2020-9484-Mass-Scan https://github.com/PenTestical/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/AssassinUKG/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/RepublicR0K/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/anjai94/CVE-2020-9484-exploit https://github.com/ColdFusionX/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/VICXOR/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/seanachao/CVE-2020-9484 https://github& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18CVE-2020-1938 – Apache Tomcat Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1938
When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2020-1935 – tomcat: Mishandling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1935
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17569 – tomcat: Regression in handling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17569
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. La refactorización presente en Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.28 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.48 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.98 hasta 7.0.99, introdujo una regresión. El resultado de la regresión fue que los encabezados Transfer-Encoding no válidos fueron procesados incorrectamente, conllevando a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido de una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r88def002c5c78534674ca67472e035099fbe088813d50062094a1390%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc31cbabb46cdc58bbdd8519a8f64b6236b2635a3922bbeba0f0e3743%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00006.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory&# • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •