Page 5 of 24 results (0.019 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 58EXPL: 0

When an SSL profile is configured on a Virtual Server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in CPU or SSL accelerator resource utilization.   Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. • https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000133132 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 3.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 76EXPL: 0

On specific hardware platforms, on BIG-IP versions 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.7, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and all versions of 13.1.x, while Intel QAT (QuickAssist Technology) and the AES-GCM/CCM cipher is in use, undisclosed conditions can cause BIG-IP to send data unencrypted even with an SSL Profile applied. En plataformas de hardware específicas, En BIG-IP versiones 16.1.x anteriores a 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x anteriores a 15.1.7, 14.1.x anteriores a 14.1.5.1 y todas las versiones de la 13.1.x, mientras es usado Intel QAT (QuickAssist Technology) y el cifrado AES-GCM/CCM, las condiciones no reveladas pueden causar que BIG-IP envíe datos sin cifrar incluso con un perfil SSL aplicado • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K31523465 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. El Protocolo de Acuerdo de Claves Diffie-Hellman permite a atacantes remotos (del lado del cliente) enviar números arbitrarios que en realidad no son claves públicas, y desencadenar costosos cálculos de exponenciación modular DHE del lado del servidor, también se conoce como un ataque D(HE)ater. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-506569.pdf https://dheatattack.com https://dheatattack.gitlab.io https://github.com/Balasys/dheater https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/162 https://gitlab.com/dheatattack/dheater https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10374117 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K83120834 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-004.txt https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration https: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 81EXPL: 2

Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. Las versiones de lodash inferiores a 4.17.12, son vulnerables a la Contaminación de Prototipo. La función defaultsDeep podría ser engañada para agregar o modificar las propiedades de Object.prototype usando una carga útil de constructor. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in lodash. • https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-10744 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3024 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191004-0005 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-450202 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K47105354?utm_source=f5support&amp%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10744 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •