Page 5 of 65 results (0.004 seconds)

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

In FreeBSD before 11.2-STABLE(r338986), 11.2-RELEASE-p4, 11.1-RELEASE-p15, 10.4-STABLE(r338985), and 10.4-RELEASE-p13, due to improper maintenance of IPv6 protocol control block flags through various failure paths, an unprivileged authenticated local user may be able to cause a NULL pointer dereference causing the kernel to crash. En FreeBSD en versiones anteriores a la 11.2-STABLE(r338986), 11.2-RELEASE-p4, 11.1-RELEASE-p15, 10.4-STABLE(r338985) y 10.4-RELEASE-p13, debido al mantenimiento indebido de las etiquetas de bloques de control del protocolo IPv6 mediante varias rutas de error, un usuario local autenticado sin privilegios podría provocar una desreferencia de puntero NULL que haga que el kernel se cierre inesperadamente. • https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-18:11.listen.asc https://www.flexera.com/company/secunia-research/advisories/SR-2018-21.html • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

In FreeBSD before 11.1-STABLE, 11.2-RELEASE-p2, 11.1-RELEASE-p13, ip fragment reassembly code is vulnerable to a denial of service due to excessive system resource consumption. This issue can allow a remote attacker who is able to send an arbitrary ip fragments to cause the machine to consume excessive resources. En FreeBSD en versiones anteriores a la 11.1-STABLE, 11.2-RELEASE-p2 y 11.1-RELEASE-p13, el código de reensamblado de fragmentos de ip es vulnerable a una denegación de servicio (DoS) debido al consumo excesivo de recursos del sistema. Este problema puede permitir que un atacante remoto que pueda enviar fragmentos de ip arbitrarios haga que la máquina consuma demasiados recursos. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105336 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041505 https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-18:10.ip.asc • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Improper bounds checking of the obuf variable in the link_ntoa() function in linkaddr.c of the BSD libc library may allow an attacker to read or write from memory. The full impact and severity depends on the method of exploit and how the library is used by applications. According to analysis by FreeBSD developers, it is very unlikely that applications exist that utilize link_ntoa() in an exploitable manner, and the CERT/CC is not aware of any proof of concept. A blog post describes the functionality of link_ntoa() and points out that none of the base utilities use this function in an exploitable manner. For more information, please see FreeBSD Security Advisory SA-16:37. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037398 https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:37.libc.asc https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/548487 https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94694 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

In FreeBSD through 11.1, the smb_strdupin function in sys/netsmb/smb_subr.c has a race condition with a resultant out-of-bounds read, because it can cause t2p->t_name strings to lack a final '\0' character. En FreeBSD hasta la versión 11.1, la función smb_strdupin en sys/netsmb/smb_subr.c tiene una condición de carrera con una lectura fuera de límites porque puede hace que les falten el carácter "\0" a las cadenas t2p->t_name. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101191 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222687 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=324102 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

In FreeBSD before 11.2-RELEASE, an application which calls setrlimit() to increase RLIMIT_STACK may turn a read-only memory region below the stack into a read-write region. A specially crafted executable could be exploited to execute arbitrary code in the user context. En FreeBSD en versiones anteriores a la 11.2-RELEASE, una aplicación que llama a setrlimit() para incrementar RLIMIT_STACK podría hacer que una región de memoria de solo lectura bajo la pila pase a ser una región de lectura y escritura. Un ejecutable especialmente manipulado podría explotarse para ejecutar código arbitrario en el contexto del usuario. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42279 https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •