Page 5 of 26 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 757EXPL: 0

Insufficient access control in a subsystem for Intel (R) processor graphics in 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor J, N, Silver and Gold Series; Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor J, N, G3900 and G4900 Series; Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor A and E3900 Series; Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processor E3-1500 v5 and v6, E-2100 and E-2200 Processor Families; Intel(R) Graphics Driver for Windows before 26.20.100.6813 (DCH) or 26.20.100.6812 and before 21.20.x.5077 (aka15.45.5077), i915 Linux Driver for Intel(R) Processor Graphics before versions 5.4-rc7, 5.3.11, 4.19.84, 4.14.154, 4.9.201, 4.4.201 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. Un control de acceso insuficiente en un subsistema para Intel® processor graphics en 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Generation Intel® Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel® Pentium® Processor J, N, Silver y Gold Series; Intel® Celeron® Processor J, N, G3900 y G4900 Series; Intel® Atom® Processor A y E3900 Series; Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1500 v5 y v6, E-2100 y E-2200 Processor Families; Intel® Graphics Driver para versiones de Windows anteriores a 26.20.100.6813 (DCH) o 26.20.100.6812 y versiones anteriores a 21.20.x.5077 (también se conoce como 15.45.5077), i915 Linux Driver para Intel® Processor Graphics versiones anteriores a 5.4-rc7, 5.3. 11, 4.19.84, 4.14.154, 4.9.201, 4.4.201, puede habilitar a un usuario autenticado para permitir potencialmente una escalada de privilegios por medio de un acceso local. A flaw was found in the Intel graphics hardware (GPU), where a local attacker with the ability to issue commands to the GPU could inadvertently lead to memory corruption and possible privilege escalation. The attacker could use the GPU blitter to perform privilege MMIO operations, not limited to the address space required to function correctly. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155375/Slackware-Security-Advisory-Slackware-14.2-kernel-Updates.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3841 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3887 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3889 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3908 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0204 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Nov/26 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200320-0005 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K73659122 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 298EXPL: 0

Insufficient access control in subsystem for Intel (R) processor graphics in 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel(R) Pentium(R) Processor J, N, Silver and Gold Series; Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor J, N, G3900 and G4900 Series; Intel(R) Atom(R) Processor A and E3900 Series; Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processor E3-1500 v5 and v6 and E-2100 Processor Families may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. Un control de acceso insuficiente en el subsistema para Intel® processor graphics en 6th, 7th, 8th y 9th Generation Intel® Core(TM) Processor Families; Intel® Pentium® Processor J, N, Silver y Gold Series; Intel® Celeron® Processor J, N, G3900 y G4900 Series; Intel® Atom® Processor A y E3900 Series; Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1500 v5 y v6 y E-2100 Processor Families, puede habilitar a un usuario autenticado para permitir potencialmente una denegación de servicio por medio de un acceso local. A flaw was found in Intel graphics hardware (GPU) where a local attacker with the ability to issue an ioctl could trigger a hardware level crash if MMIO registers were read while the graphics card was in a low-power state. This creates a denial of service situation and the GPU and connected displays will remain unusable until a reboot occurs. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155375/Slackware-Security-Advisory-Slackware-14.2-kernel-Updates.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0204 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Nov/26 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200320-0004 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K73659122?utm_source=f5support&amp%3Butm_medium=RSS https://usn.ubuntu.com/4186-2 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00260.html https://access.redhat.com/security/ • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1095EXPL: 0

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a speculative buffer overflow and side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y la predicción de ramas podría permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un desbordamiento de búfer especulativo y el análisis de canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions past bounds check. The flaw relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code and the fact that memory writes occur to an address which depends on the untrusted value. Such writes cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2384 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2395 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1946 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0174 https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/685359 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes+in+StruxureWare+Data+Center+Expert+v7.6.0 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180823-0001 https://www.oracle.com/s • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 97%CPEs: 1090EXPL: 3

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores con ejecución especulativa y predicción indirecta de ramas podrían permitir la revelación no autorizada de información al atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de un canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited. Variant CVE-2017-5715 triggers the speculative execution by utilizing branch target injection. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43427 https://github.com/GalloLuigi/Analisi-CVE-2017-5715 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •