Page 5 of 22 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 8EXPL: 1

visionmedia send before 0.8.4 for Node.js uses a partial comparison for verifying whether a directory is within the document root, which allows remote attackers to access restricted directories, as demonstrated using "public-restricted" under a "public" directory. visionmedia send anterior a 0.8.4 para Node.js utiliza una comparación parcial para verificar si un directorio está dentro del root del documento, lo que permite a atacantes remotos acceder a directorios restringidos, tal y como fue demostrado mediante el uso de 'público restringido' bajo un directorio 'publico'. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-October/139938.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-October/140020.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-September/139415.html http://secunia.com/advisories/62170 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21687263 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/24/1 http://www.openwall.com • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 97%CPEs: 28EXPL: 3

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h no restringe debidamente el procesamiento de mensajes ChangeCipherSpec, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle provocar el uso de una clave maestra de longitud cero en ciertas comunicaciones OpenSSL-a-OpenSSL, y como consecuencia secuestrar sesiones u obtener información sensible, a través de una negociación TLS manipulada, también conocido como la vulnerabilidad de 'inyección CCS'. It was found that OpenSSL clients and servers could be forced, via a specially crafted handshake packet, to use weak keying material for communication. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to decrypt and modify traffic between a client and a server. • https://github.com/secretnonempty/CVE-2014-0224 https://github.com/iph0n3/CVE-2014-0224 http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/workbench/en/wb-news-6-1-7.html http://esupport.trendmicro.com/solution/en-US/1103813.aspx http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB29195 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/ • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength CWE-841: Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow •