CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-46859 – platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-46859
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough. Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute. Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller. For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9291fadbd2720a869b1d2fcf82305648e2e62a16 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6821a82616f60aa72c5909b3e252ad97fb9f7e2a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b38c19783286a71693c2194ed1b36665168c09c4 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f52e98d16e9bd7dd2b3aef8e38db5cbc9899d6a4 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-46848 – perf/x86/intel: Limit the period on Haswell
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-46848
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/x86/intel: Limit the period on Haswell Running the ltp test cve-2015-3290 concurrently reports the following warnings. perfevents: irq loop stuck! WARNING: CPU: 31 PID: 32438 at arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:3174 intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 Call Trace: <NMI> ? __warn+0xa4/0x220 ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x285/0x370 ? __report_bug+0x123/0x130 ? • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a632cb229bfb18b6d09822cc842451ea46c013e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15210b7c8caff4929f25d049ef8404557f8ae468 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0eaf812aa1506704f3b78be87036860e5d0fe81d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8717dc35c0e5896f4110f4b3882f7ff787a5f73d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25dfc9e357af8aed1ca79b318a73f2c59c1f0b2b •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2024-46844 – um: line: always fill *error_out in setup_one_line()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-46844
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: um: line: always fill *error_out in setup_one_line() The pointer isn't initialized by callers, but I have encountered cases where it's still printed; initialize it in all possible cases in setup_one_line(). • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bedb7ce080690d0d6172db790790c1219bcbdd5 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96301fdc2d533a196197c055af875fe33d47ef84 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8944d449fda9f58c03bd99649b2df09948fc874 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43f782c27907f306c664b6614fd6f264ac32cce6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/289979d64573f43df1d0e6bc6435de63a0d69cdf https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec5b47a370177d79ae7773858042c107e21f8ecc https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc843d3837ebcb1c16d3768ef3eb55e25d5331f2 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/824ac4a5edd3f7494ab1996826c4f47f8 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2024-46843 – scsi: ufs: core: Remove SCSI host only if added
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-46843
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: core: Remove SCSI host only if added If host tries to remove ufshcd driver from a UFS device it would cause a kernel panic if ufshcd_async_scan fails during ufshcd_probe_hba before adding a SCSI host with scsi_add_host and MCQ is enabled since SCSI host has been defered after MCQ configuration introduced by commit 0cab4023ec7b ("scsi: ufs: core: Defer adding host to SCSI if MCQ is supported"). To guarantee that SCSI host is removed only if it has been added, set the scsi_host_added flag to true after adding a SCSI host and check whether it is set or not before removing it. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f49e05d6b58d660f035a75ff96b77071b4bd5ed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3844586e9bd9845140e1078f1e61896b576ac536 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7cbff570dbe8907e23bba06f6414899a0fbb2fcc •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2024-46842 – scsi: lpfc: Handle mailbox timeouts in lpfc_get_sfp_info
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-46842
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: lpfc: Handle mailbox timeouts in lpfc_get_sfp_info The MBX_TIMEOUT return code is not handled in lpfc_get_sfp_info and the routine unconditionally frees submitted mailbox commands regardless of return status. The issue is that for MBX_TIMEOUT cases, when firmware returns SFP information at a later time, that same mailbox memory region references previously freed memory in its cmpl routine. Fix by adding checks for the MBX_TIMEOUT return code. During mailbox resource cleanup, check the mbox flag to make sure that the wait did not timeout. If the MBOX_WAKE flag is not set, then do not free the resources because it will be freed when firmware completes the mailbox at a later time in its cmpl routine. Also, increase the timeout from 30 to 60 seconds to accommodate boot scripts requiring longer timeouts. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bba47fe3b038cca3d3ebd799665ce69d6d273b58 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ede596b1434b57c0b3fd5c02b326efe5c54f6e48 •