CVE-2016-9840 – zlib: Out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in inftrees.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9840
inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic. Inftrees.c en zlib 1.2.8 podría permitir que los atacantes dependientes del contexto tener un impacto no especificado al aprovechar la aritmética de puntero incorrecta. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95131 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039427 https:/ •
CVE-2016-9843 – zlib: Big-endian out-of-bounds pointer
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9843
The crc32_big function in crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving big-endian CRC calculation. La función crc32_big en crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 podría permitir que atacantes dependientes del contexto causen impactos no especificados mediante vectores que implican cálculos CRC big-endian. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus •
CVE-2016-9841 – zlib: Out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in inffast.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9841
inffast.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic. inffast.c en zlib 1.2.8 puede permitir que atacantes dependientes del contexto causen un impacto no especificado aprovechando una aritmética de puntero incorrecta.. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus •
CVE-2016-9842 – zlib: Undefined left shift of negative number
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9842
The inflateMark function in inflate.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving left shifts of negative integers. La función inflateMark en inflate.c en zlib 1.2.8 podría permitir que los atacantes dependientes del contexto tener un impacto no especificado a través de vectores que implican cambios a la izquierda de enteros negativos. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95131 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039427 https:/ •
CVE-2016-7055 – openssl: Carry propagating bug in Montgomery multiplication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7055
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94242 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037261 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public • CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation •