Page 5 of 38 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 35EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in c-ares library, where a missing input validation check of host names returned by DNS (Domain Name Servers) can lead to output of wrong hostnames which might potentially lead to Domain Hijacking. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la biblioteca c-ares, en la que una falta de comprobación de la comprobación de entrada de los nombres de host devueltos por los DNS (Servidores de Nombres de Dominio) puede conllevar a una salida de nombres de host erróneos, que podría conllevar potencialmente a un Secuestro de Dominios. La mayor amenaza de esta vulnerabilidad es para la confidencialidad e integridad, así como para la disponibilidad del sistema • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988342 https://c-ares.haxx.se/adv_20210810.html https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-02 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3672 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1

Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, and 12.22.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks under certain conditions on Windows platforms. More specifically, improper configuration of permissions in the installation directory allows an attacker to perform two different escalation attacks: PATH and DLL hijacking. Node.js versiones anteriores a 16.4.1, 14.17.2 y 12.22.2, es vulnerable a ataques de escalada de privilegios locales bajo determinadas condiciones en plataformas Windows. Más concretamente, una configuración inapropiada de los permisos en el directorio de instalación permite a un atacante llevar a cabo dos ataques de escalada diferentes: PATH y secuestro de DLL • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1211160 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2021-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210805-0003 • CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1

Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read when uv__idna_toascii() is used to convert strings to ASCII. The pointer p is read and increased without checking whether it is beyond pe, with the latter holding a pointer to the end of the buffer. This can lead to information disclosures or crashes. This function can be triggered via uv_getaddrinfo(). Node.js versiones anteriores a 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2, es vulnerable a una lectura fuera de límites cuando la función uv__idna_toascii() es usada para convertir cadenas a ASCII. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1209681 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2021-security-releases https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-23 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210805-0003 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22918 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979338 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •