CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 67EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23840 – Integer overflow in CipherUpdate
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23840
Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6a51b9e1d0cf0bf8515f7201b68fb0a3482b3dc1 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9b1129239f3ebb1d1c98ce9ed41d5c9476c47cb2 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23839 – Incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23839
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=30919ab80a478f2d81f2e9acdcca3fa4740cd547 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2021-23336 – Web Cache Poisoning
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23336
The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious requests being cached as completely safe ones, as the proxy would usually not see the semicolon as a separator, and therefore would not include it in a cache key of an unkeyed parameter. El paquete python/cpython desde versiones 0 y anteriores a 3.6.13, desde versiones 3.7.0 y anteriores a 3.7.10, desde versiones 3.8.0 y anteriores a 3.8.8, desde versiones 3.9.0 y anteriores a 3.9.2, son vulnerables al envenenamiento de caché web por medio de urllib.parse.parse_qsl y urllib.parse.parse_qs usando un vector llamado encubrimiento de parámetros. Cuando el atacante puede separar los parámetros de la consulta usando un punto y coma (;), pueden causar una diferencia en la interpretación de la petición entre el proxy (que se ejecuta con la configuración predeterminada) y el servidor. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/01/2 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24297 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra8ce70088ba291f358e077cafdb14d174b7a1ce9a9d86d1b332d6367%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc005f4de9d9b0ba943ceb8ff5a21a5c6ff8a9df52632476698d99432%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E https:/&#x • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2021-2015
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-2015
Vulnerability in the Oracle Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Worklist). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.10. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Workflow. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Workflow, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Workflow accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Workflow accessible data. • https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2021-1999
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-1999
Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: RAS subsystems). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit executes to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit accessible data. • https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html •