CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1288 – kafka: Users can perform Broker actions via crafted fetch requests, interfering with data replication and causing data lass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1288
In Apache Kafka 0.9.0.0 to 0.9.0.1, 0.10.0.0 to 0.10.2.1, 0.11.0.0 to 0.11.0.2, and 1.0.0, authenticated Kafka users may perform action reserved for the Broker via a manually created fetch request interfering with data replication, resulting in data loss. En Apache Kafka desde la versión 0.9.0.0.0 hasta la 0.9.0.1, desde la 0.10.0.0 hasta la 0.10.2.1, desde la 0.11.0.0.0 hasta la 0.11.0.2 y en la versión 1.0.0.0, los usuarios autenticados de Kafka pueden realizar acciones reservadas para el Broker a través de una petición fetch creada manualmente que interfiere con la replicación de datos, lo que provoca la pérdida de datos. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104900 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3768 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29f61337323f48c47d4b41d74b9e452bd60e65d0e5103af9a6bb2fef%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/519eb0fd45642dcecd9ff74cb3e71c20a4753f7d82e2f07864b5108f%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b0656d359c7d40ec9f39c8cc61bca66802ef9a2a12ee199f5b0c1442%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1581fb6464c9bec8a72575c01f5097d68e2fbb230aff24622622a58%40%3Ccommits.kafka.apac • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 27%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2381
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2381
Perl might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass the taint protection mechanism in a child process via duplicate environment variables in envp. Perl podría permitir a atacantes dependientes de contexto eludir los mecanismos de protección taint en un proceso hijo a través de variables de entorno duplicadas en envp. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-03/msg00112.html http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/ae37b791a73a9e78dedb89fb2429d2628cf58076 http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3501 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/326387 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html http://www.securityfocus.com/b • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2010-0873
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-0873
Unspecified vulnerability in the Data Server component in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 7.0.6.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad sin especificar en el componente Data Server en Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database v7.0.6.0, permite a atacantes remotos comprometer la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2010-175626.html •