Page 5 of 105 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.34 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending a large amount of network traffic, as demonstrated by netperf UDP tests. La implementación del socket en net/core/sock.c en el kernel de Linux anterior a v2.6.34 no maneja correctamente un retraso de los paquetes recibidos, que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria) mediante el envío de una gran cantidad de la red tráfico, como lo demuestran las pruebas netperf UDP. • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=8eae939f1400326b06d0c9afe53d2a484a326871 http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/3/6271093/thread http://secunia.com/advisories/46397 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.34 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46637 http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.35 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large amount of network traffic, related to the sk_add_backlog function and the sk_rmem_alloc socket field. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-4251. La implementación del socket en net/core/sock.c en el kernel de Linux anteriores a v2.6.35 no maneja correctamente un retraso de los paquetes recibidos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio mediante el envío de una gran cantidad de tráfico de la red, relacionados con la función sk_add_backlog y el campo de toma de sk_rmem_alloc. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2010-4251. • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6 http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/3/6271093/thread http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.35 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46637 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657303 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-4805 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 270EXPL: 0

The seunshare_mount function in sandbox/seunshare.c in seunshare in certain Red Hat packages of policycoreutils 2.0.83 and earlier in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6 and earlier, and Fedora 14 and earlier, mounts a new directory on top of /tmp without assigning root ownership and the sticky bit to this new directory, which allows local users to replace or delete arbitrary /tmp files, and consequently cause a denial of service or possibly gain privileges, by running a setuid application that relies on /tmp, as demonstrated by the ksu application. La función seunshare_mount en sandbox/seunshare.c en seunshare en ciertos paquetes de Red Hat de policycoreutils v2.0.83 y anteriores de Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) v6 y anteriores, y Fedora v14 y anteriores, monta un nuevo directorio en la parte superior de /tmp sin asignar la pertenencia de root y el bit sticky a este nuevo directorio, lo que permite a usuarios locales reemplazar o eliminar de archivos /tmp de su elección, y por lo tanto provocar una denegación de servicio o ganar privilegios en su caso, mediante la ejecución de una aplicación setuid que se basa en /tmp, como demostrado por la aplicación de KSU. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2011-02/0585.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056227.html http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/23/1 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/23/2 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=policycoreutils.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf=policycoreutils-rhat.patch%3Bh=d4db5bc06027de23d12a4b3f18fa6f9b1517df27%3Bhb=HEAD#l2197 http://secunia.com/advisories/43415 http://secunia.com/advisories/43844 http://secunia&# • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 1

The cluster logical volume manager daemon (clvmd) in lvm2-cluster in LVM2 before 2.02.72, as used in Red Hat Global File System (GFS) and other products, does not verify client credentials upon a socket connection, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (daemon exit or logical-volume change) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted control commands. El cluster logical volume manager daemon (clvmd) en lvm2-cluster en LVM2 anterior v2.02.72, como el usado en Red Hat Global File System (GFS) y otros productos, no verifica las credenciales de cliente sobre una conexión socket, permitiendo a usuarios locales causar una denegación de servicio (cuelgue del demonio o cambio de volumen lógico) o probablemente tener otros impactos a través de comandos de control manipulados. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-09/msg00006.html http://secunia.com/advisories/40759 http://securitytracker.com/id?1024258 http://www.osvdb.org/66753 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1001-1 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1944 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614248 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/60809 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0567.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0568.html htt • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 96%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), como el usado en JBoss Enterprise Application Platform v4.3.0 para Red Hat Linux, no sanea adecuadamente las entradas de de la expresiones de Expression LanguageJBoss Expression Language (EL), lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de URL manipuladas. NOTA: Solo se da esta vulnerabilidad cuando el Java Security Manager no está configurado adecuadamente. JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, allows attackers to perform remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36653 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0117.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0564.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41994 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024253 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1929 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615956 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/60794 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20161017-0001 https://access.redhat. • CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •