CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7481 – ansible: Security issue with lookup return not tainting the jinja2 environment
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7481
Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe. If an attacker could control the results of lookup() calls, they could inject Unicode strings to be parsed by the jinja2 templating system, resulting in code execution. By default, the jinja2 templating language is now marked as 'unsafe' and is not evaluated. Ansible en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.1.0 y 2.4.0.0 no marca correctamente los resultados del plugin lookup como no seguros. Si un atacante pudiese controlar los resultados de las llamadas lookup(), podrían inyectar cadenas Unicode para que sean analizadas por el sistema de plantillas jinja2, resultando en una ejecución de código. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98492 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1244 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1334 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1499 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1599 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2524 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7481 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/ed56f51f185a1ffd7ea57130d260098686fcc7c2 https://lists.deb • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1795 – glusterfs: glusterfs-server %pretrans rpm script temporary file issue
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1795
Red Hat Gluster Storage RPM Package 3.2 allows local users to gain privileges and execute arbitrary code as root. Red Hat Gluster Storage Paquete RPM 3.2 permite a los usuarios locales obtener privilegios y ejecutar código arbitrario como root. It was found that glusterfs-server RPM package would write file with predictable name into world readable /tmp directory. A local attacker could potentially use this flaw to escalate their privileges to root by modifying the shell script during the installation of the glusterfs-server package. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0484.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0486.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99311 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038128 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200927 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1795 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-377: Insecure Temporary File •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2125 – samba: Unconditional privilege delegation to Kerberos servers in trusted realms
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2125
It was found that Samba before versions 4.5.3, 4.4.8, 4.3.13 always requested forwardable tickets when using Kerberos authentication. A service to which Samba authenticated using Kerberos could subsequently use the ticket to impersonate Samba to other services or domain users. Se ha descubierto que Samba, en versiones anteriores a la 4.5.3, 4.4.8 y 4.3.13, siempre solicitaba tickets que podían reenviarse al emplear la autenticación de Kerberos. Un servicio al que Samba se ha autenticado con Kerberos podría emplear el ticket para suplantar Samba con otros usuarios de servicios o dominios. It was found that Samba always requested forwardable tickets when using Kerberos authentication. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0494.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0495.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0662.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0744.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94988 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037494 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1265 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-2125 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2125.html https://access.redhat.c • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 6.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5242 – swiftonfile: use of insecure Python pickle for metadata serialization and storage
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5242
OpenStack Swift-on-File (aka Swiftonfile) does not properly restrict use of the pickle Python module when loading metadata, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted extended attribute (xattrs). OpenStack Swift-on-File (también conocido como Swiftonfile) no restringe adecuadamente el uso del módulo Python pickle cuando carga metadatos, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un atributo extendido manipulado (xattrs). A flaw was found in the way swiftonfile (gluster-swift) serialized and stored metadata on disk by using Python's pickle module. A remote, authenticated user could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the storage node. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1918.html https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1985893 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258743 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237994 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5242 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •