CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3624
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3624
Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby 1.9.2 and 1.8.7 and earlier do not validate the X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Server headers in requests, which might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary text into log files or bypass intended address parsing via a crafted header. Varios métodos en WEBrick::HTTPRequest en Ruby versiones 1.9.2 y versiones 1.8.7 y anteriores, no comprueban los encabezados X-Fordered-For, X-Fordered-Host y X-Fordered-Server en las peticiones, lo que podría permitir a los atacantes remotos inyectar texto arbitrario en archivos de registro o omitir el análisis de direcciones previsto por medio de un encabezado diseñado. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3624 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3624 https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5418 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3624 • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1CVE-2019-16255 – ruby: Code injection via command argument of Shell#test / Shell#[]
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16255
Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows code injection if the first argument (aka the "command" argument) to Shell#[] or Shell#test in lib/shell.rb is untrusted data. An attacker can exploit this to call an arbitrary Ruby method. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite una inyección de código si el primer argumento (también conocido como el argumento "command") para Shell#[] o Shell#test en la biblioteca lib/shell.rb es un dato no seguro. Un atacante puede explotar esto para llamar a un método de Ruby arbitrario. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/327512 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16201 – ruby: Regular expression denial of service vulnerability of WEBrick's Digest authentication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16201
WEBrick::HTTPAuth::DigestAuth in Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 has a regular expression Denial of Service cause by looping/backtracking. A victim must expose a WEBrick server that uses DigestAuth to the Internet or a untrusted network. La función WEBrick::HTTPAuth::DigestAuth en Ruby versiones hasta la versión 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, tiene una expresión regular de denegación de servicio causada mediante looping/backtracking. Una víctima debe exponer un servidor WEBrick que usa DigestAuth en Internet o una red no segura. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/661722 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16254 – ruby: HTTP response splitting in WEBrick
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16254
Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite HTTP Response Splitting. Si un programa que utiliza WEBrick inserta información no segura en el encabezado de respuesta, un atacante puede explotarlo para insertar un carácter newline para dividir un encabezado e inyectar contenido malicioso para engañar a los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/331984 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16395 – ruby: OpenSSL::X509:: Name equality check does not work correctly
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16395
An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. When two OpenSSL::X509::Name objects are compared using ==, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of == will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations. Se ha descubierto un problema en la biblioteca OpenSSL en Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.8, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.5, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.2 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a la 2.6.0-preview3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3738 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1948 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2565 https://hackerone.com/reports/387250 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •