CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44141 – samba: Information leak via symlinks of existance of files or directories outside of the exported share
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44141
All versions of Samba prior to 4.15.5 are vulnerable to a malicious client using a server symlink to determine if a file or directory exists in an area of the server file system not exported under the share definition. SMB1 with unix extensions has to be enabled in order for this attack to succeed. Todas las versiones de Samba anteriores a 4.15.5, son vulnerables a que un cliente malicioso use un enlace simbólico del servidor para determinar si un archivo o directorio se presenta en un área del sistema de archivos del servidor no exportada bajo la definición de recurso compartido. SMB1 con extensiones unix debe estar habilitado para que este ataque tenga éxito A vulnerability was found in Samba due to an insecure link following. By querying a symlink inside the exported share using SMB1 with unix extensions turned on, an attacker can discover if a named or directory exists on the filesystem outside the exported share. • https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-44141.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44141 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046120 • CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2022-0336
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-0336
The Samba AD DC includes checks when adding service principals names (SPNs) to an account to ensure that SPNs do not alias with those already in the database. Some of these checks are able to be bypassed if an account modification re-adds an SPN that was previously present on that account, such as one added when a computer is joined to a domain. An attacker who has the ability to write to an account can exploit this to perform a denial-of-service attack by adding an SPN that matches an existing service. Additionally, an attacker who can intercept traffic can impersonate existing services, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and integrity. El DC de Samba AD incluye comprobaciones cuando son añadidos nombres de directores de servicio (SPN) a una cuenta para asegurar que los SPN no presentan alias con los que ya están en la base de datos. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-0336 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046134 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14950 https://github.com/samba-team/samba/commit/1a5dc817c0c9379bbaab14c676681b42b0039a3c https://github.com/samba-team/samba/commit/c58ede44f382bd0125f761f0479c8d48156be400 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2022-0336.html • CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions •
CVSS: 9.9EPSS: 18%CPEs: 42EXPL: 3CVE-2021-44142 – Samba fruit_pwrite Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44142
The Samba vfs_fruit module uses extended file attributes (EA, xattr) to provide "...enhanced compatibility with Apple SMB clients and interoperability with a Netatalk 3 AFP fileserver." Samba versions prior to 4.13.17, 4.14.12 and 4.15.5 with vfs_fruit configured allow out-of-bounds heap read and write via specially crafted extended file attributes. A remote attacker with write access to extended file attributes can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of smbd, typically root. El módulo vfs_fruit de Samba usa atributos de archivo extendidos (EA, xattr) para proporcionar "...compatibilidad mejorada con los clientes SMB de Apple e interoperabilidad con un servidor de archivos AFP de Netatalk 3". Samba versiones anteriores a 4.13.17, 4.14.12 y 4.15.5 con vfs_fruit configurado permiten una lectura y escritura fuera de límites de la pila por medio de atributos de archivo extendidos especialmente diseñados. • https://github.com/horizon3ai/CVE-2021-44142 https://github.com/gudyrmik/CVE-2021-44142 https://github.com/hrsman/Samba-CVE-2021-44142 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14914 https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/119678 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-44142.html https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2022/2/1/cve-2021-44142-details-on-a-samba-code-execution-bug-demonstrated-at-pwn2own-austin https://access.redhat&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 2.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2021-43566
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-43566
All versions of Samba prior to 4.13.16 are vulnerable to a malicious client using an SMB1 or NFS race to allow a directory to be created in an area of the server file system not exported under the share definition. Note that SMB1 has to be enabled, or the share also available via NFS in order for this attack to succeed. Todas las versiones de Samba anteriores a 4.13.16, son vulnerables a que un cliente malicioso use una carrera SMB1 o NFS para permitir la creación de un directorio en un área del sistema de archivos del servidor no exportada bajo la definición del recurso compartido. Tenga en cuenta que SMB1 tiene que estar habilitado, o el recurso compartido también disponible por medio de NFS para que este ataque tenga éxito • https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13979 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220110-0001 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-43566.html • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23192 – samba: Subsequent DCE/RPC fragment injection vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23192
A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en que samba implementa DCE/RPC. Si un cliente a un servidor Samba enviaba una petición DCE/RPC muy grande, y elegía fragmentarla, un atacante podía reemplazar los fragmentos posteriores con sus propios datos, omitiendo los requisitos de firma A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23192 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •