CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1CVE-2021-3749 – Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in axios/axios
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3749
axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity axios es vulnerable a una Complejidad de Expresión Regular Ineficiente A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability was found in the nodejs axios. This flaw allows an attacker to provide crafted input to the trim function, which might cause high resources consumption and as a consequence lead to denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is system availability. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/5b457116e31db0e88fede6c428e969e87f290929 https://huntr.dev/bounties/1e8f07fc-c384-4ff9-8498-0690de2e8c31 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r075d464dce95cd13c03ff9384658edcccd5ab2983b82bfc72b62bb10%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r216f0fd0a3833856d6a6a1fada488cadba45f447d87010024328ccf2%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3ae6d2654f92c5851bdb73b35e96b0e4e3da39f28ac7a1b15ae3aab8%40%3Ccommits.druid.a • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 57EXPL: 1CVE-2021-25217 – A buffer overrun in lease file parsing code can be used to exploit a common vulnerability shared by dhcpd and dhclient
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25217
In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x series or lower and releases in the 4.3.x series) are beyond their End-of-Life (EOL) and no longer supported by ISC. From inspection it is clear that the defect is also present in releases from those series, but they have not been officially tested for the vulnerability), The outcome of encountering the defect while reading a lease that will trigger it varies, according to: the component being affected (i.e., dhclient or dhcpd) whether the package was built as a 32-bit or 64-bit binary whether the compiler flag -fstack-protection-strong was used when compiling In dhclient, ISC has not successfully reproduced the error on a 64-bit system. However, on a 32-bit system it is possible to cause dhclient to crash when reading an improper lease, which could cause network connectivity problems for an affected system due to the absence of a running DHCP client process. In dhcpd, when run in DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 mode: if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 32-bit architecture AND the -fstack-protection-strong flag was specified to the compiler, dhcpd may exit while parsing a lease file containing an objectionable lease, resulting in lack of service to clients. Additionally, the offending lease and the lease immediately following it in the lease database may be improperly deleted. if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 64-bit architecture OR if the -fstack-protection-strong compiler flag was NOT specified, the crash will not occur, but it is possible for the offending lease and the lease which immediately followed it to be improperly deleted. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/26/6 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-406691.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2021-25217 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00002.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5QI4DYC7J4BGHEW3NH4XHMWTHYC36UK4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23841 – Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23841
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/67 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/68 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/70 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.gentoo.org/gls • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23839 – Incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23839
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=30919ab80a478f2d81f2e9acdcca3fa4740cd547 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 48EXPL: 6CVE-2021-23337 – Command Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23337
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. Las versiones de Lodash anteriores a la 4.17.21 son vulnerables a la inyección de comandos a través de la función de plantilla A flaw was found in nodejs-lodash. A command injection flaw is possible through template variables. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/ddfd9b11a0126db2302cb70ec9973b66baec0975/lodash.js%23L14851 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210312-0006 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGFUJIONWEBJARS-1074932 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARS-1074930 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWER-1074928 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSBOWERGITHUBLODASH-1074931 https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGWEBJARSNPM-1074929 https://snyk. • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •