CVSS: 9.9EPSS: 18%CPEs: 42EXPL: 3CVE-2021-44142 – Samba fruit_pwrite Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44142
The Samba vfs_fruit module uses extended file attributes (EA, xattr) to provide "...enhanced compatibility with Apple SMB clients and interoperability with a Netatalk 3 AFP fileserver." Samba versions prior to 4.13.17, 4.14.12 and 4.15.5 with vfs_fruit configured allow out-of-bounds heap read and write via specially crafted extended file attributes. A remote attacker with write access to extended file attributes can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of smbd, typically root. El módulo vfs_fruit de Samba usa atributos de archivo extendidos (EA, xattr) para proporcionar "...compatibilidad mejorada con los clientes SMB de Apple e interoperabilidad con un servidor de archivos AFP de Netatalk 3". Samba versiones anteriores a 4.13.17, 4.14.12 y 4.15.5 con vfs_fruit configurado permiten una lectura y escritura fuera de límites de la pila por medio de atributos de archivo extendidos especialmente diseñados. • https://github.com/horizon3ai/CVE-2021-44142 https://github.com/gudyrmik/CVE-2021-44142 https://github.com/hrsman/Samba-CVE-2021-44142 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14914 https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/119678 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-44142.html https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2022/2/1/cve-2021-44142-details-on-a-samba-code-execution-bug-demonstrated-at-pwn2own-austin https://access.redhat&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2019-14907 – samba: Crash after failed character conversion at log level 3 or above
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-14907
All samba versions 4.9.x before 4.9.18, 4.10.x before 4.10.12 and 4.11.x before 4.11.5 have an issue where if it is set with "log level = 3" (or above) then the string obtained from the client, after a failed character conversion, is printed. Such strings can be provided during the NTLMSSP authentication exchange. In the Samba AD DC in particular, this may cause a long-lived process(such as the RPC server) to terminate. (In the file server case, the most likely target, smbd, operates as process-per-client and so a crash there is harmless). Todas las versiones de samba 4.9.x anteriores a 4.9.18, 4.10.x anteriores a 4.10.12 y 4.11.x anteriores a 4.11.5, presentan un problema donde si se configura con "log level = 3" (o superior), la cadena obtenida desde el cliente, luego de una conversión de caracteres fallida, es impresa. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00055.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14907 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00013.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ACZVNMIFQGGXNJPMHAVBN3H2U65FXQY https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GQ6U65I2K23YJC4FESW477WL55TU3PPT https: • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 4CVE-2018-8897 – Microsoft Windows - 'POP/MOV SS' Privilege Escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8897
A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44697 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45024 https://github.com/can1357/CVE-2018-8897 https://github.com/nmulasmajic/CVE-2018-8897 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d8ba61ba58c88d5207c1ba2f7d9a2280e7d03be9 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/1 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/4 http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190921-01-debug-en http: • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 30%CPEs: 54EXPL: 3CVE-2017-14491 – Dnsmasq < 2.78 - 2-byte Heap Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-14491
Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response. Un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en dnsmasq en versiones anteriores a la 2.78 permite a los atacantes provocar una denegación de servicio (cierre inesperado) o ejecutar código arbitrario utilizando una respuesta DNS manipulada. A heap buffer overflow was found in dnsmasq in the code responsible for building DNS replies. An attacker could send crafted DNS packets to dnsmasq which would cause it to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Dnsmasq versions prior to 2.78 suffer from a 2-byte heap-based overflow vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42941 https://github.com/skyformat99/dnsmasq-2.4.1-fix-CVE-2017-14491 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00006.html http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4560 http://nvidia.custhelp.com/a • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •