CVE-2022-33746
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-33746
P2M pool freeing may take excessively long The P2M pool backing second level address translation for guests may be of significant size. Therefore its freeing may take more time than is reasonable without intermediate preemption checks. Such checking for the need to preempt was so far missing. La liberación del pool P2M puede tardar demasiado El pool P2M que respalda la traducción de direcciones de segundo nivel para huéspedes puede tener un tamaño considerable. Por lo tanto, su liberación puede tomar más tiempo de lo que es razonable sin comprobaciones intermedias de preferencia. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/3 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-410.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJOMUNGW6VTK5CZZRLWLVVEOUPEQBRHI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XWSC77GS5NATI3TT7FMVPULUPXR635XQ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZVXG7OOOXCX6VIPEMLFDPIPUTFAYWPE https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https:// • CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release •
CVE-2022-33748
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-33748
lock order inversion in transitive grant copy handling As part of XSA-226 a missing cleanup call was inserted on an error handling path. While doing so, locking requirements were not paid attention to. As a result two cooperating guests granting each other transitive grants can cause locks to be acquired nested within one another, but in respectively opposite order. With suitable timing between the involved grant copy operations this may result in the locking up of a CPU. Inversión del orden de bloqueo en el manejo de la copia de concesión transitiva Como parte de XSA-226 fue insertada una llamada de limpieza que faltaba en una ruta de manejo de errores. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/2 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-411.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJOMUNGW6VTK5CZZRLWLVVEOUPEQBRHI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XWSC77GS5NATI3TT7FMVPULUPXR635XQ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZVXG7OOOXCX6VIPEMLFDPIPUTFAYWPE https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https:// • CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •
CVE-2022-26357
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-26357
race in VT-d domain ID cleanup Xen domain IDs are up to 15 bits wide. VT-d hardware may allow for only less than 15 bits to hold a domain ID associating a physical device with a particular domain. Therefore internally Xen domain IDs are mapped to the smaller value range. The cleaning up of the housekeeping structures has a race, allowing for VT-d domain IDs to be leaked and flushes to be bypassed. Una carrera en la limpieza del ID de dominio de VT-d Los ID de dominio de Xen presentan hasta 15 bits de ancho. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/05/2 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-399.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ETPM2OVZZ6KOS2L7QO7SIW6XWT5OW3F https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UHFSRVLM2JUCPDC2KGB7ETPQYJLCGBLD https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-399.txt • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVE-2022-26356
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-26356
Racy interactions between dirty vram tracking and paging log dirty hypercalls Activation of log dirty mode done by XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram (was named HVMOP_track_dirty_vram before Xen 4.9) is racy with ongoing log dirty hypercalls. A suitably timed call to XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram can enable log dirty while another CPU is still in the process of tearing down the structures related to a previously enabled log dirty mode (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_OFF). This is due to lack of mutually exclusive locking between both operations and can lead to entries being added in already freed slots, resulting in a memory leak. Una activación del modo de registro sucio realizada por XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram (es llamada HVMOP_track_dirty_vram antes de Xen versión 4.9) es producido con las hiperllamadas de registro sucio en curso. Una llamada a XEN_DMOP_track_dirty_vram con el tiempo apropiado puede habilitar log dirty mientras otra CPU está todavía en el proceso de desmontar las estructuras relacionadas con un modo log dirty previamente habilitado (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_OFF). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/05/1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-397.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ETPM2OVZZ6KOS2L7QO7SIW6XWT5OW3F https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UHFSRVLM2JUCPDC2KGB7ETPQYJLCGBLD https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-397.txt • CWE-667: Improper Locking •
CVE-2022-23035
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23035
Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest's use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid. Un saneo insuficiente de las IRQs de dispositivos pasados. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt • CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup •