CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 78EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5743 – Limiting simultaneous TCP clients was ineffective
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5743
By design, BIND is intended to limit the number of TCP clients that can be connected at any given time. The number of allowed connections is a tunable parameter which, if unset, defaults to a conservative value for most servers. Unfortunately, the code which was intended to limit the number of simultaneous connections contained an error which could be exploited to grow the number of simultaneous connections beyond this limit. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.6, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3, and 9.11.5-S5. • https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5743 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K74009656?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_20 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5743 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702541 • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 351EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6609
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6609
Platform dependent weakness. This issue only impacts iSeries platforms. On these platforms, in BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator) versions 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.3, and 12.1.1 HF2-12.1.4, the secureKeyCapable attribute was not set which causes secure vault to not use the F5 hardware support to store the unit key. Instead the unit key is stored in plaintext on disk as would be the case for Z100 systems. Additionally this causes the unit key to be stored in UCS files taken on these platforms. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K18535734 • CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6592
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6592
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.1, TMM may restart and produce a core file when validating SSL certificates in client SSL or server SSL profiles. En BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.1, TMM puede reiniciarse y producir un archivo core durante la validación de certificados SSL en los perfiles SSL del cliente o del servidor. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107176 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K54167061 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 1CVE-2019-9075
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9075
An issue was discovered in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32. It is a heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap in archive64.c. Se ha descubierto un problema en la biblioteca Binary File Descriptor (BFD), también conocida como libbfd, tal y como se distribuye en GNU Binutils 2.32. Es un desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en _bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap en archive64.c. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00078.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00004.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-24 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190314-0003 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24236 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K42059040 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4336-1 • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •