CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2007-2461
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-2461
The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used. El agente transmisor DHCP en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (abandono de paquetes) mediante un mensaje DHCPREQUEST o DHCPINFORM que provoca que múltiples mensajes DHCPACK sean enviados desde servidores DHCP al agente, lo cual consume la memoria reservada para un búfer local. NOTA: esta situación sólo se da cuando se usan múltiples servidores DHCP. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080833172.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/530057 http://www.osvdb.org/35330 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23763 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017999 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018000 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1635 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34026 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0CVE-2006-3906
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-3906
Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. Protocolo Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1, implementado para Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, y PIX firewalls, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (agotamiento de recursos) a través de un flood de paquetes IKE Phase-1 que exceden el ratio de expiración de la sesión. NOTA: se ha indicado que esto es debido a un diseño debil del protocolo IKe version 1, en cuyo caso otros vendedores e implementaciones podrían verse afectados. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-07/0531.html http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1293 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016582 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tsd_technology_security_response09186a00806f33d4.html http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cisco-concentrator-dos.html http://www.osvdb.org/29068 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441203/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19176 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities& •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 33%CPEs: 66EXPL: 2CVE-2006-0515 – Cisco - WebSense Content Filtering Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-0515
Cisco PIX/ASA 7.1.x before 7.1(2) and 7.0.x before 7.0(5), PIX 6.3.x before 6.3.5(112), and FWSM 2.3.x before 2.3(4) and 3.x before 3.1(7), when used with Websense/N2H2, allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP access restrictions by splitting the GET method of an HTTP request into multiple packets, which prevents the request from being sent to Websense for inspection, aka bugs CSCsc67612, CSCsc68472, and CSCsd81734. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27830 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-May/045899.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20044 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016039 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016040 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/netmgtsw/ps2032/tsd_products_security_response09186a00806824ec.html http://www.osvdb.org/25453 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433270/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17883 http://www.vsecurity.c •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 156EXPL: 0CVE-2005-4499
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4499
The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. • http://secunia.com/advisories/18141 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_field_notice09186a00805bf1c4.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/22193 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420020/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420103/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16025 •
CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 1%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3788
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3788
Race condition in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 7.0(0), 7.0(2), and 7.0(4), when running with an Active/Standby configuration and when the failover LAN interface fails, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (standby firewall failure) by sending spoofed ARP responses from an IP address of an active firewall, which prevents the standby firewall from becoming active, aka "failover denial of service." Condición de carrera en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 7.0(0), 7.0(2), Y 7.0(4), cuando corre una configuración Activo/En Espera y cuando la interfaz LAN de reserva falla, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (fallo de cortafuegos en espera) enviando respuestas ARP suplantadas de la dirección IP de un cortafuegos activo, lo que impide que el cortafuegos en espera se vuelva activo, tcc "denegación de servicio de reserva". • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=113199814008230&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=113201784415859&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/17550 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/178 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015205 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15407 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/23160 •