Page 52 of 302 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 50%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted Silverlight application, (3) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (4) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Vulnerability." La Rutina de Lenguaje Comun (CLR) en Microsoft .NET Framework v2.0, v2.0 SP1, v2.0 SP2, v3.5, and v3.5 SP1, y Silverlight v2, no gestiona adecuadamente las interfaces, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de (1) una aplicación manipulada de navegador XAML (XBAP), (2) una aplicación manipulada de Silverlight, (3) una aplicación manipulada de ASP.NET, o (4) una aplicación manipulada de .NET Framework, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de el CLR de Microsoft Silverlight y Microsoft .NET Framework". • http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-061 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6510 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 50%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 does not properly enforce a certain type-equality constraint in .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Type Verification Vulnerability." Microsoft .NET Framework v2.0, v2.0 SP1, y v3.5 no cumple adecuadamente con la limitación de igualdad de tipos en un código .NET, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a traves de (1) una aplicación XAML del navegador (XABP), (2) una aplicación ASP.NET manipulada o (3) una aplicación .NET Framework manipulada, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de verificación de tipos de .NET". • http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-061 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6451 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 35%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0

GDI+ in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 SP1, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, 2007 Microsoft Office System SP1 and SP2, Office Project 2002 SP1, Visio 2002 SP2, Office Word Viewer, Word Viewer 2003 Gold and SP3, Office Excel Viewer 2003 Gold and SP3, Office Excel Viewer, Office PowerPoint Viewer 2007 Gold, SP1, and SP2, Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1 and SP2, Expression Web, Expression Web 2, Groove 2007 Gold and SP1, Works 8.5, SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services SP2, SQL Server 2005 SP2 and SP3, Report Viewer 2005 SP1, Report Viewer 2008 Gold and SP1, and Forefront Client Security 1.0 does not properly allocate an unspecified buffer, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image file that triggers memory corruption, aka "GDI+ TIFF Memory Corruption Vulnerability." GDI+ en Microsoft Internet Explorer v6 SP1, Windows XP SP2 y SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, 2007 Microsoft Office System SP1 y SP2, Office Project 2002 SP1, Visio 2002 SP2, Office Word Viewer, Word Viewer 2003 Gold y SP3, Office Excel Viewer 2003 Gold y SP3, Office Excel Viewer, Office PowerPoint Viewer 2007 Gold, SP1, y SP2, Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1 y SP2, Expression Web, Expression Web v2, Groove 2007 Gold y SP1, Works v8.5, SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services SP2, SQL Server 2005 SP2 y SP3, Report Viewer 2005 SP1, Report Viewer 2008 Gold y SP1, y Forefront Client Security v1.0 no localiza adecuadamente un búfer sin especificar, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un fichero de imagen TIFF que inicia una corrupción de memoria, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de corrupción de memoria GDI+ TIFF" This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Microsoft Windows. User interaction is required in that a user must open a malicious image file or browse to a malicious website. The specific flaws exist in the GDI+ subsystem when parsing maliciously crafted TIFF files. By supplying a malformed graphic control extension an attacker can trigger an exploitable memory corruption condition. Successful exploitation can result in arbitrary code execution under the credentials of the currently logged in user. • http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-062 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6491 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 95%CPEs: 13EXPL: 1

Buffer overflow in the Office Web Components ActiveX Control in Microsoft Office XP SP3, Office 2000 Web Components SP3, Office XP Web Components SP3, BizTalk Server 2002, and Visual Studio .NET 2003 SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted property values, aka "Office Web Components Buffer Overflow Vulnerability." Desbordamiento de búfer en Office Web Components ActiveX Control en Microsoft Office XP SP3, Office 2000 Web Components SP3, Office XP Web Components SP3, BizTalk Server 2002, y Visual Studio .NET 2003 SP1 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante valores modificados en la propiedad, también conocido como "Vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer en Office Web Components". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16542 http://osvdb.org/56916 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35992 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022708 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-223A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-043 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6326 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 2.6EPSS: 96%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2 and 3.5 Gold and SP1, when ASP 2.0 is used in integrated mode on IIS 7.0, does not properly manage request scheduling, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a series of crafted HTTP requests, aka "Remote Unauthenticated Denial of Service in ASP.NET Vulnerability." ASP.NET en Microsoft .NET Framework v2.0 SP1 y SP2 y v3.5 Gold y SP1, cuando ASP 2.0 es usado en modo integrado sobre IIS v7.0, no administra adecuadamente las peticiones de planificación, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (parada de demonio) a través de una serie de peticiones HTTP manipuladas, también conocida como "Vulnerabilidad de denegación de servicio remota no autenticada en ASP.NET". • http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2009/08/11/ms09-035-asp-net-denial-of-service-vulnerability.aspx http://osvdb.org/56905 http://secunia.com/advisories/36127 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35985 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022715 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-223A.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2231 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-036 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •