CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 88%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2019-2449 – Oracle Java jnlp Protocol Directory Traversal Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2449
Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Deployment). The supported version that is affected is Java SE: 8u192. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106597 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190118-0001 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-2449 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685601 •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16886 – etcd: Improper Authentication in auth/store.go:AuthInfoFromTLS() via gRPC-gateway
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16886
etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway. etcd, en sus versiones 3.2.x anteriores a la 3.2.26 y versiones 3.3.x anteriores a la 3.3.11, es vulnerable a una autorización incorrecta cuando se emplea un control de acceso basado en roles (RBAC) y client-cert-auth se encuentra habilitado. Si un certificado TLS del servidor etcd del cliente contiene un "Common Name" (CN) que coincide con un nombre de usuario RBAC válido, un atacante remoto podría autenticarse como dicho usuario con cualquier certificado (confiable) del cliente en una petición REST API en gRPC-gateway. Etcd, versions 3.2.0 through 3.2.25 and 3.3.0 through 3.3.10, are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server's TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106540 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0237 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1352 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16886 https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/1eee465a43720d713bb69f7b7f5e120135fdb1ac/CHANGELOG-3.2.md#security-authentication https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/1eee465a43720d713bb69f7b7f5e120135fdb1ac/CHANGELOG-3.3.md#security-authentication https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6133 – polkit: Temporary auth hijacking via PID reuse and non-atomic fork
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6133
In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. En PolicyKit (también conocido como polkit) 0.115, el mecanismo de protección "start time" puede omitirse debido a que fork() no es atómico y, por lo tanto, las decisiones de autorización se cachean incorrectamente. Esto está relacionado con la falta de comprobación de uid en polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. A vulnerability was found in polkit. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00049.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106537 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0832 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2699 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2978 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1692 https://git.kernel.org/linus/7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1CVE-2018-16866 – systemd: out-of-bounds read when parsing a crafted syslog message
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16866
An out of bounds read was discovered in systemd-journald in the way it parses log messages that terminate with a colon ':'. A local attacker can use this flaw to disclose process memory data. Versions from v221 to v239 are vulnerable. Se ha descubierto una lectura fuera de límites en systemd-journald en la forma en la que analiza mensajes de registro que terminan con dos puntos ":". Un atacante local puede emplear este error para divulgar datos de la memoria del proceso. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152841/System-Down-A-systemd-journald-Exploit.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/05/10/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106527 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2091 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3222 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0593 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16866 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/25&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 1CVE-2018-16864 – systemd: stack overflow when calling syslog from a command with long cmdline
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16864
An allocation of memory without limits, that could result in the stack clashing with another memory region, was discovered in systemd-journald when a program with long command line arguments calls syslog. A local attacker may use this flaw to crash systemd-journald or escalate his privileges. Versions through v240 are vulnerable. Se ha descubierto una asignación de memoria sin límites, que podría resultar en que la pila choque con otra región de memoria, en systemd-journald, cuando un programa con argumentos largos de la línea de comandos llama a syslog. Un atacante local podría emplear este error para provocar el cierre inesperado de systemd-journald o escalar sus privilegios. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/20/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106523 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0049 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0204 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0271 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0342 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0361 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2402 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_ • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •