Page 52 of 1161 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use incorrect access checking in temp file handling to disclose contents of files on the system otherwise not readable. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear la comprobación de acceso incorrecta en el manejo de archivos temporales para revelar el contenido de los archivos del sistema que, normalmente, no estarían disponibles. It was discovered that the ghostscript did not properly restrict access to files open prior to enabling the -dSAFER mode. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and disclose the content of affected files via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a054156d425b4dbdaaa9fda4b5f1182b27598c2b https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3650 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699658 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE- • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-377: Insecure Temporary File •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24. A type confusion in "ztype" could be used by remote attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 9.24 de Artifex Ghostscript. Una confusión de tipos en "ztype" podría ser empleada por atacantes remotos que puedan proporcionar PostScript manipulado para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete o, posiblemente, otro tipo de impacto sin especificar. It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator did not properly validate its operands. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=0edd3d6c634a577db261615a9dc2719bca7f6e01 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q3/182 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3650 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699659 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 14EXPL: 5

An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24. Incorrect "restoration of privilege" checking during handling of /invalidaccess exceptions could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to execute code using the "pipe" instruction. Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 9.24 de Artifex Ghostscript. La comprobación incorrecta de "restoration of privilege" durante el manejo de excepciones /invalidaccess podría ser empleada por atacantes que sean capaces de proporcionar PostScript manipulado para ejecutar código mediante la instrucción "pipe". It was discovered that the ghostscript /invalidaccess checks fail under certain conditions. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45369 https://github.com/farisv/PIL-RCE-Ghostscript-CVE-2018-16509 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2018-16509 https://github.com/rhpco/CVE-2018-16509 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5516c614dc33662a2afdc377159f70218e67bde5 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=78911a01b67d590b4a91afac2e8417360b934156 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=79cccf641486a6595c43f1de1cd7ade696020a31 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=gho •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way dic_unserialize function of glusterfs does not handle negative key length values. An attacker could use this flaw to read memory from other locations into the stored dict value. Se ha detectado un error en la forma en la que la función dic_unserialize en glusterfs no gestiona los valores de longitud de clave negativos. Un atacante podría utilizar este error para leer la memoria de otras ubicaciones en el valor dict almacenado. A flaw was found in dict.c:dict_unserialize function of glusterfs, dic_unserialize function does not handle negative key length values. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00035.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2607 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2608 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2892 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3242 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10911 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1

libelf/elf_end.c in elfutils 0.173 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (double free and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact because it tries to decompress twice. libelf/elf_end.c en elfutils 0.173 permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (doble liberación y cierre inesperado de la aplicación) o, probablemente, cualquier otro tipo de problema debido a que trata de descomprimir dos veces. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00052.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2197 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00030.html https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23528 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4012-1 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-16402 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id • CWE-415: Double Free CWE-416: Use After Free •