CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 8%CPEs: 26EXPL: 3CVE-2019-10092 – Apache Httpd mod_proxy - Error Page Cross-Site Scripting
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10092
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed. En Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.0 hasta 2.4.39, se reportó un problema de cross-site scripting limitado que afecta la página de error de mod_proxy. Un atacante podría causar que el enlace sobre la página de error sea malformado y, en su lugar, apunte a una página de su elección. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47688 https://github.com/mbadanoiu/CVE-2019-10092 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/15/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/08/08/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/08/08/9 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4126 https://github.com/DrunkenShells/Disclosures/tree/master/CVE-2019-10092-Limited%20Cross-Site%20 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 110EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10086 – apache-commons-beanutils: does not suppresses the class property in PropertyUtilsBean by default
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10086
In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean. En Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, se agregó una clase especial BeanIntrospector que permite suprimir la capacidad de un atacante para acceder al cargador de clases a través de la propiedad de clase disponible en todos los objetos Java. Sin embargo, no se esta usando esta característica por defecto de PropertyUtilsBean. A flaw was found in the Apache Commons BeanUtils, where the class property in PropertyUtilsBean is not suppressed by default. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00007.html http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201908.mbox/%3cC628798F-315D-4428-8CB1-4ED1ECC958E4%40apache.org%3e https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4317 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0057 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0804 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0805 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0806 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 371EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9506 – Blutooth BR/EDR specification does not specify sufficient encryption key length and allows an attacker to influence key length negotiation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9506
The Bluetooth BR/EDR specification up to and including version 5.1 permits sufficiently low encryption key length and does not prevent an attacker from influencing the key length negotiation. This allows practical brute-force attacks (aka "KNOB") that can decrypt traffic and inject arbitrary ciphertext without the victim noticing. La especificación de Bluetooth BR/EDR incluyendo versión 5.1, permite una longitud de clave de cifrado suficientemente baja y no impide que un atacante influya en la negociación de longitud de clave. Esto permite ataques prácticos de fuerza bruta (también se conoce como "KNOB") que pueden descifrar el tráfico e inyectar texto cifrado arbitrario sin que la víctima se dé cuenta. A flaw was discovered in the Bluetooth protocol. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00036.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00037.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/11 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/13 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/14 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/15 http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/publications/publication12404-abstract.html http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190828-01-knob-en https: • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9518 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9518
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9516 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9516
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una fuga de encabezado, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2745 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2746 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2775 https&# • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •