CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HTTP / 2 son vulnerables al almacenamiento en búfer de datos interal sin restricciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/15/7 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2893 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2946 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 9%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manipulación del tamaño de la ventana y la manipulación de priorización de flujo, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10176 – atomic-openshift: CSRF tokens not refreshing while user is logged in and are exposed in the URL
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10176
A flaw was found in OpenShift Container Platform, versions 3.11 and later, in which the CSRF tokens used in the cluster console component were found to remain static during a user's session. An attacker with the ability to observe the value of this token would be able to re-use the token to perform a CSRF attack. Se detectó un fallo en OpenShift Container Platform, versiones 3.11 y posteriores, en la que se encontró que los tokens CSRF usados en el componente cluster console permanecían estáticos durante la sesión de un usuario. Un atacante con la capacidad de observar el valor de este token podría ser capaz de reutilizar el token para realizar un ataque de tipo CSRF. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2792 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4053 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10176 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10176 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712569 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2019-3884 – atomic-openshift: cross-namespace owner references can trigger deletions of valid children
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-3884
A vulnerability exists in the garbage collection mechanism of atomic-openshift. An attacker able spoof the UUID of a valid object from another namespace is able to delete children of those objects. Versions 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 and 4.1 are affected. Se presenta una vulnerabilidad en el mecanismo garbage collection de atomic-openshift. Un atacante capaz de suplantar el UUID de un objeto válido de otro espacio de nombres es capaz de eliminar elementos secundarios de esos objetos. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3884 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-3884 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693905 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •