CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2019-2529 – mysql: Server: Optimizer unspecified vulnerability (CPU Jan 2019)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2529
Vulnerability in the MySQL Server component of Oracle MySQL (subcomponent: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions that are affected are 5.6.42 and prior, 5.7.24 and prior and 8.0.13 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106619 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2484 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2511 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/02/msg00000.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201908-24 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190118-0002 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3867-1 https://access.redhat.co •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 88%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2019-2449 – Oracle Java jnlp Protocol Directory Traversal Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2449
Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Deployment). The supported version that is affected is Java SE: 8u192. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106597 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0469 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0640 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1238 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190118-0001 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-2449 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685601 •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16886 – etcd: Improper Authentication in auth/store.go:AuthInfoFromTLS() via gRPC-gateway
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16886
etcd versions 3.2.x before 3.2.26 and 3.3.x before 3.3.11 are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway. etcd, en sus versiones 3.2.x anteriores a la 3.2.26 y versiones 3.3.x anteriores a la 3.3.11, es vulnerable a una autorización incorrecta cuando se emplea un control de acceso basado en roles (RBAC) y client-cert-auth se encuentra habilitado. Si un certificado TLS del servidor etcd del cliente contiene un "Common Name" (CN) que coincide con un nombre de usuario RBAC válido, un atacante remoto podría autenticarse como dicho usuario con cualquier certificado (confiable) del cliente en una petición REST API en gRPC-gateway. Etcd, versions 3.2.0 through 3.2.25 and 3.3.0 through 3.3.10, are vulnerable to an improper authentication issue when role-based access control (RBAC) is used and client-cert-auth is enabled. If an etcd client server's TLS certificate contains a Common Name (CN) which matches a valid RBAC username, a remote attacker may authenticate as that user with any valid (trusted) client certificate in a REST API request to the gRPC-gateway. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106540 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0237 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1352 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16886 https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/1eee465a43720d713bb69f7b7f5e120135fdb1ac/CHANGELOG-3.2.md#security-authentication https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/1eee465a43720d713bb69f7b7f5e120135fdb1ac/CHANGELOG-3.3.md#security-authentication https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6133 – polkit: Temporary auth hijacking via PID reuse and non-atomic fork
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6133
In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. En PolicyKit (también conocido como polkit) 0.115, el mecanismo de protección "start time" puede omitirse debido a que fork() no es atómico y, por lo tanto, las decisiones de autorización se cachean incorrectamente. Esto está relacionado con la falta de comprobación de uid en polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. A vulnerability was found in polkit. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00049.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106537 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0832 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2699 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2978 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1692 https://git.kernel.org/linus/7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 1CVE-2018-16865 – systemd: stack overflow when receiving many journald entries
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16865
An allocation of memory without limits, that could result in the stack clashing with another memory region, was discovered in systemd-journald when many entries are sent to the journal socket. A local attacker, or a remote one if systemd-journal-remote is used, may use this flaw to crash systemd-journald or execute code with journald privileges. Versions through v240 are vulnerable. Se ha descubierto una asignación de memoria sin límites que podría resultar en que la pila choque con otra región de memoria, en systemd-journald, cuando se envían muchas entradas al socket de journal. Un atacante local, o uno remoto si se emplea systemd-journal-remote, podría emplear este error para provocar el cierre inesperado de systemd-journald o ejecutar código con privilegios de journald. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152841/System-Down-A-systemd-journald-Exploit.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/05/10/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/20/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106525 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0049 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0204 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019 • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •