CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2024-26727 – btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-26727
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read [BUG] There is a syzbot crash, triggered by the ASSERT() during subvolume creation: assertion failed: !anon_dev, in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_root_ref.part.0+0x9aa/0xa60 <TASK> btrfs_get_new_fs_root+0xd3/0xf0 create_subvol+0xd02/0x1650 btrfs_mksubvol+0xe95/0x12b0 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2f9/0x4f0 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16b/0x200 btrfs_ioctl+0x35f0/0x5cf0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] During create_subvol(), after inserting root item for the newly created subvolume, we would trigger btrfs_get_new_fs_root() to get the btrfs_root of that subvolume. The idea here is, we have preallocated an anonymous device number for the subvolume, thus we can assign it to the new subvolume. But there is really nothing preventing things like backref walk to read the new subvolume. If that happens before we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root(), the subvolume would be read out, with a new anonymous device number assigned already. In that case, we would trigger ASSERT(), as we really expect no one to read out that subvolume (which is not yet accessible from the fs). But things like backref walk is still possible to trigger the read on the subvolume. Thus our assumption on the ASSERT() is not correct in the first place. [FIX] Fix it by removing the ASSERT(), and just free the @anon_dev, reset it to 0, and continue. If the subvolume tree is read out by something else, it should have already get a new anon_dev assigned thus we only need to free the preallocated one. En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: btrfs: no haga ASSERT() si el subvolumen recién creado ya se leyó [ERROR] Hay un bloqueo del syzbot, provocado por ASSERT() durante la creación del subvolumen: la aserción falló: ! anon_dev, en fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319 ------------[ cortar aquí ]------------ ERROR del kernel en fs/btrfs/disk -io.c:1319! • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2dfb1e43f57dd3aeaa66f7cf05d068db2d4c8788 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/917d608fe375041eb7f29befa6a6d7fd3cf32dde https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f5d47eb163bceb1b9e613c9003bae5fefc0046f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e31546b0f34af21738c4ceac47d662c00ee6382f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66b317a2fc45b2ef66527ee3f8fa08fb5beab88d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/833775656d447c545133a744a0ed1e189ce61430 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a172344bfdabb46458e03708735d7b1a918c468 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e03ee2fe873eb68c1f9ba5112fee70303 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-26726 – btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-26726
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error While running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panic with generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache. assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1 RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in one instance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However on the second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode to get the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with the free space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlocking with the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for the requested range. This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache out we hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2024-26725 – dpll: fix possible deadlock during netlink dump operation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-26725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dpll: fix possible deadlock during netlink dump operation Recently, I've been hitting following deadlock warning during dpll pin dump: [52804.637962] ====================================================== [52804.638536] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [52804.639111] 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #1 Not tainted [52804.639529] ------------------------------------------------------ [52804.640104] python3/2984 is trying to acquire lock: [52804.640581] ffff88810e642678 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.641417] but task is already holding lock: [52804.642010] ffffffff83bde4c8 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.642747] which lock already depends on the new lock. [52804.643551] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [52804.644259] -> #1 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.644836] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.645271] __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150 [52804.645723] dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.646169] genl_start+0x266/0x320 [52804.646578] __netlink_dump_start+0x321/0x450 [52804.647056] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.647575] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.648001] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210 [52804.648440] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.648831] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.649290] netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.649742] __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0 [52804.650165] __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210 [52804.650597] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [52804.651045] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.651474] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.652001] -> #0 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.652650] check_prev_add+0x1ae/0x1280 [52804.653107] __lock_acquire+0x1ed3/0x29a0 [52804.653559] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.653984] __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150 [52804.654423] netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.654845] __netlink_dump_start+0x389/0x450 [52804.655321] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.655842] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.656272] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210 [52804.656721] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.657119] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.657570] netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.658022] __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0 [52804.658450] __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210 [52804.658877] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [52804.659322] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.659752] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.660281] other info that might help us debug this: [52804.661077] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [52804.661671] CPU0 CPU1 [52804.662129] ---- ---- [52804.662577] lock(dpll_lock); [52804.662924] lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.663538] lock(dpll_lock); [52804.664073] lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.664490] The issue as follows: __netlink_dump_start() calls control->start(cb) with nlk->cb_mutex held. In control->start(cb) the dpll_lock is taken. Then nlk->cb_mutex is released and taken again in netlink_dump(), while dpll_lock still being held. That leads to ABBA deadlock when another CPU races with the same operation. Fix this by moving dpll_lock taking into dumpit() callback which ensures correct lock taking order. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: dpll: soluciona un posible punto muerto durante la operación de volcado de netlink Recientemente, he estado recibiendo la siguiente advertencia de punto muerto durante el volcado de pin de dpll: [52804.637962] =========== =========================================== [52804.638536] ADVERTENCIA: posible circular dependencia de bloqueo detectada [52804.639111] 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #1 No contaminado [52804.639529] -------------------------------- ---------------------- [52804.640104] python3/2984 está intentando adquirir el bloqueo: [52804.640581] ffff88810e642678 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}- {3:3}, en: netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.641417] pero la tarea ya mantiene el bloqueo: [52804.642010] ffffffff83bde4c8 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.642747] qué bloqueo ya depende del nuevo bloqueo. [52804.643551] la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: [52804.644259] -> #1 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.644836] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.645271] __mutex_lock+ 0x119/0x1150 [52804.645723] dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.646169] genl_start+0x266/0x320 [52804.646578] __netlink_dump_start+0x321/0x450 [52804.647056 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.647575] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.648001] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/ 0x210 [52804.648440] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.648831] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.649290] netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.649742] __sock_sendmsg +0x73/0xc0 [52804.650165] __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210 [52804.650597] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [ 52804.651045] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.651474] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.652001] -> #0 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.6 52650] check_prev_add+0x1ae/0x1280 [52804.653107 ] __lock_acquire+0x1ed3/0x29a0 [52804.653559] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.653984] __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150 [52804.654423] netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.654 845] __netlink_dump_start+0x389/0x450 [52804.655321] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.655842] genl_rcv_msg +0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.656272] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210 [52804.656721] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.657119] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.657570] netlink_sendm sg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.658022] __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0 [52804.658450] __sys_sendto+0x184 /0x210 [52804.658877] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [52804.659322] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.659752] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.66 0281] otra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto: [52804.661077] Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: [52804.661671] CPU0 CPU1 [52804.662129] ---- ---- [52804.662577] bloqueo(dpll_lock); [52804.662924] bloqueo (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.663538] bloqueo(dpll_lock); [52804.664073] bloqueo (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.664490] El problema es el siguiente: __netlink_dump_start() llama a control->start(cb) con nlk->cb_mutex retenido. En control->start(cb) se toma dpll_lock. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9d71b54b65b1fb6c0d3a6c5c88ba9b915c783fbc https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/087739cbd0d0b87b6cec2c0799436ac66e24acc8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53c0441dd2c44ee93fddb5473885fd41e4bc2361 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2024-26724 – net/mlx5: DPLL, Fix possible use after free after delayed work timer triggers
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-26724
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: DPLL, Fix possible use after free after delayed work timer triggers I managed to hit following use after free warning recently: [ 2169.711665] ================================================================== [ 2169.714009] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timers.part.0+0x179/0x4c0 [ 2169.716293] Write of size 8 at addr ffff88812b326a70 by task swapper/4/0 [ 2169.719022] CPU: 4 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #2 [ 2169.720974] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 2169.722457] Call Trace: [ 2169.722756] <IRQ> [ 2169.723024] dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0xb0 [ 2169.723417] print_report+0xc5/0x630 [ 2169.723807] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x126/0x2b0 [ 2169.724268] kasan_report+0xbe/0xf0 [ 2169.724667] ? __run_timers.part.0+0x179/0x4c0 [ 2169.725116] ? __run_timers.part.0+0x179/0x4c0 [ 2169.725570] __run_timers.part.0+0x179/0x4c0 [ 2169.726003] ? call_timer_fn+0x320/0x320 [ 2169.726404] ? • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/496fd0a26bbf73b6b12407ee4fbe5ff49d659a6d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1596126ea50228f0ed96697bae4e9368fda02c56 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa1eec2f546f2afa8c98ec41e5d8ee488165d685 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-26723 – lan966x: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-26723
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lan966x: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag There is a crash when adding one of the lan966x interfaces under a lag interface. The issue can be reproduced like this: ip link add name bond0 type bond miimon 100 mode balance-xor ip link set dev eth0 master bond0 The reason is because when adding a interface under the lag it would go through all the ports and try to figure out which other ports are under that lag interface. And the issue is that lan966x can have ports that are NULL pointer as they are not probed. So then iterating over these ports it would just crash as they are NULL pointers. The fix consists in actually checking for NULL pointers before accessing something from the ports. Like we do in other places. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cabc9d49333df72fe0f6d58bdcf9057ba341e701 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9357489c46c7a43999964628db8b47d3a1f8672 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48fae67d837488c87379f0c9f27df7391718477c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a492f01228b7d091dfe38974ef40dccf8f9f2f1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15faa1f67ab405d47789d4702f587ec7df7ef03e • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •