Page 59 of 358 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 44%CPEs: 83EXPL: 0

Heap-based buffer overflow in the JBIG2 filter in Adobe Reader 7 and Acrobat 7 before 7.1.3, Adobe Reader 8 and Acrobat 8 before 8.1.6, and Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9 before 9.1.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file that triggers memory corruption. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica en el filtro JBIG2 en Adobe Reader v7 y Acrobat v7 anteriores a v7.1.3, Adobe Reader 8 y Acrobat v8 anteriores a v8.1.6, y Adobe Reader v9 y Acrobat v9 anteriores a v9.1.2 podría permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de fichero manipulado que provoque una corrupción de memoria. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00002.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34580 http://secunia.com/advisories/35496 http://secunia.com/advisories/35655 http://secunia.com/advisories/35685 http://secunia.com/advisories/35734 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200907-06.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1022361 http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-07.html http:&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 83EXPL: 0

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader 7 and Acrobat 7 before 7.1.3, Adobe Reader 8 and Acrobat 8 before 8.1.6, and Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9 before 9.1.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors, related to "Adobe internally discovered issues." Múltiples vulnerabilidades sin especificar en cualwuier Adobe Reader 7 d Acrobat 7 anterior a v7.1.3, Ie 8 anterior a v8.1.6, y Adobe Reader 9 y Acrobat 9 anterior a v9.1.2 tiene vectores de ataque y un impacto desconocido relacional con "cuestiones Adobe internally discovered". • http://secunia.com/advisories/35496 http://secunia.com/advisories/35734 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200907-06.xml http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-07.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1109.html https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/51126 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-2028 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505049 •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 55%CPEs: 83EXPL: 0

Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader 7 and Acrobat 7 before 7.1.3, Adobe Reader 8 and Acrobat 8 before 8.1.6, and Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9 before 9.1.2 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file containing a malformed U3D model file with a crafted extension block. Un desbordamiento de búfer en la región stack de la memoria en Reader versión 7 y Acrobat versiones 7 anteriores a 7.1.3 de Adobe, Reader versión 8 y Acrobat versiones 8 anteriores a 8.1.6 y Reader versión 9 y Acrobat versiones 9 anteriores a 9.1.2 de Adobe, podría permitir a los atacantes ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de un archivo PDF que contiene un archivo de modelo U3D malformado con un bloque de extensión diseñado. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious web address or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists when parsing malformed U3D model files contained in a PDF. When a specially crafted extension block of a model is processed, insufficient bounds checking is done before a call to wcsncpy(). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-07/msg00002.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34580 http://secunia.com/advisories/35496 http://secunia.com/advisories/35655 http://secunia.com/advisories/35685 http://secunia.com/advisories/35734 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200907-06.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1022361 http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-07.html http:&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Opera executes DOM calls in response to a javascript: URI in the target attribute of a submit element within a form contained in an inline PDF file, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended Adobe Acrobat JavaScript restrictions on accessing the document object, as demonstrated by a web site that permits PDF uploads by untrusted users, and therefore has a shared document.domain between the web site and this javascript: URI. NOTE: the researcher reports that Adobe's position is "a PDF file is active content." Opera ejecuta llamadas a DOM en respuesta a un "javascript: URI" en el atributo target de un elemento submit en un formulario contenido en un fichero PDF, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos eludir las restricciones JavaScript al acceder al objeto de documento, como lo demuestran un sitio web que permite subir archivos PDF por usuarios no confiables, y por lo tanto disponer de un document.domain compartido entre el sitio web y este "javascript: URI". NOTA: El investigador informa de que la posición de Adobe es "un archivo PDF es contenido activo". • http://secniche.org/papers/SNS_09_03_PDF_Silent_Form_Re_Purp_Attack.pdf http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503183/100/0/threaded • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Apple Safari executes DOM calls in response to a javascript: URI in the target attribute of a submit element within a form contained in an inline PDF file, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended Adobe Acrobat JavaScript restrictions on accessing the document object, as demonstrated by a web site that permits PDF uploads by untrusted users, and therefore has a shared document.domain between the web site and this javascript: URI. NOTE: the researcher reports that Adobe's position is "a PDF file is active content." Apple Safari ejecuta llamadas DOM en respuesta a un javascript en el atributo "target" (objetivo) de un elemento submit dentro de un formulario contenido en un fichero PDF en línea, lo que puede permitir a usuarios remotos evitar las restricciones de Adobe Acrobat JavaScript de acceder al documento objeto, como se ha demostrado en un wervidor web que permite subir ficheros PDF por usuarios no confiables, y tener un document.domain compartido entre el servidor web y este javascript. NOTA: el investigador ha informado de que la posición de Adobe es "un fichero PDF es un contenido activo.". • http://secniche.org/papers/SNS_09_03_PDF_Silent_Form_Re_Purp_Attack.pdf http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503183/100/0/threaded • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •