CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5965 – Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 201508-01
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5965
11 Aug 2015 — The SSL-VPN feature in Fortinet FortiOS before 4.3.13 only checks the first byte of the TLS MAC in finished messages, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof encrypted content via a crafted MAC field. Vulnerabilidad en la funciionalidad SSL-VPN en Fortinet FortiOS en versiones anteriores a 4.3.13, sólo comprueba el primer byte de la TLS MAC en los mensajes finalizados, lo que hace que sea más fácil para atacantes remotos suplantar el contenido cifrado a través de un campo MAC manipulado. Multipl... • http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-016 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2323
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2323
11 Aug 2015 — FortiOS 5.0.x before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.4 supports anonymous, export, RC4, and possibly other weak ciphers when using TLS to connect to FortiGuard servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets. Vulnerabilidad en FortiOS 5.0.x en versiones anteriores a 5.0.12 y 5.2.x en versiones anteriores a 5.2.4 admite el anonimato, exportación, RC4 y posiblemente otros cifrados débiles al utilizar TLS para conectarse a los servidores de FortiGuard, lo que permite a a... • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-24-weak-ciphers-suites-are-presented-towards-fortiguard-servers • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0351
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0351
10 Sep 2014 — The FortiManager protocol service in Fortinet FortiOS before 4.3.16 and 5.x before 5.0.8 on FortiGate devices does not prevent use of anonymous ciphersuites, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information or interfere with communications by modifying the client-server data stream. El servicio de protocolo FortiManager en Fortinet FortiOS anterior a 4.3.16 y 5.x anterior a 5.0.8 en los dispositivos FortiGate devices no previene el uso de los suites de cifrado anónimos, ... • http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-14-006 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2014-2216
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-2216
25 Aug 2014 — The FortiManager protocol service in Fortinet FortiOS before 4.3.16 and 5.0.0 before 5.0.8 on FortiGate devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. El servicio de protocolo FortiManager en Fortinet FortiOS anterior a 4.3.16 y 5.0.0 anterior a 5.0.8 en los dispositivos FortiGate permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio y posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una solicitud manipulada. • http://secunia.com/advisories/60724 •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 3CVE-2013-1414 – Fortigate Firewalls - Cross-Site Request Forgery
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-1414
28 Jun 2013 — Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Fortinet FortiOS on FortiGate firewall devices before 4.3.13 and 5.x before 5.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify (1) settings or (2) policies, or (3) restart the device via a rebootme action to system/maintenance/shutdown. Múltiples vulnerabilidades de falsificación de peticiones en sitios cruzados (CSRF) en Fortinet FortiOS en el dispositivo firewall FortiGate anteriores a v4.3.13 y... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/122216 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2013-4604
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-4604
25 Jun 2013 — Fortinet FortiOS before 5.0.3 on FortiGate devices does not properly restrict Guest capabilities, which allows remote authenticated users to read, modify, or delete the records of arbitrary users by leveraging the Guest role. Fortinet FortiOS antes de v5.0.3 para dispositivos FortiGate no restringe correctamente las capacidades del invitado, lo que permite a usuarios remotamente leer, modificar o borrar registros o usuarios aprovechando el rol de invitado. • http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2013-20 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2006-3222
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-3222
24 Jun 2006 — The FTP proxy module in Fortinet FortiOS (FortiGate) before 2.80 MR12 and 3.0 MR2 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus scanning via the Enhanced Passive (EPSV) FTP mode. El módulo proxy FTP Fortinet FortiOS (FortiGate) anterior v2.80 MR12 y v3.0 MR2 permite a atacantes remotos superar el escaneo del anti-virus a través del modo Enhanced Passive (EPSV) FTP. • http://attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-July/000921.html •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3057
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3057
31 Dec 2005 — The FTP component in FortiGate 2.8 running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, and other versions before 3.0 MR1, allows remote attackers to bypass the Fortinet FTP anti-virus engine by sending a STOR command and uploading a file before the FTP server response has been sent, as demonstrated using LFTP. • http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042139.html •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 3EXPL: 1CVE-2005-3058 – Fortinet Fortigate 2.x/3.0 - URL Filtering Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3058
31 Dec 2005 — Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27203 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2005-4570
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4570
29 Dec 2005 — The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementations in Fortinet FortiOS 2.50, 2.80 and 3.0, FortiClient 2.0,; and FortiManager 2.80 and 3.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination of a process that is automatically restarted) via IKE packets with invalid values of certain IPSec attributes, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the vendor advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-366... • http://secunia.com/advisories/18446 •