Page 6 of 47 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 83%CPEs: 63EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.8.x, 9.9.0 through 9.9.6, and 9.10.0 through 9.10.1 does not limit delegation chaining, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and named crash) via a large or infinite number of referrals. ISC BIND 9.0.x hasta 9.8.x, 9.9.0 hasta 9.9.6, y 9.10.0 hasta 9.10.1 no limita el encadenamiento de la delegación, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria y caída del nombrado) a través de un número grande o infinito de referencias. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND followed DNS delegations. A remote attacker could use a specially crafted zone containing a large number of referrals which, when looked up and processed, would cause named to use excessive amounts of memory or crash. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0524.html http://cert.ssi.gouv.fr/site/CERTFR-2014-AVI-512/index.html http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-002.txt.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10676 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00017.html http://lists&# • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 8%CPEs: 278EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P4, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P4, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P4, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (named daemon hang) via unspecified combinations of resource records. ISC BIND v9.x antes de v9.7.6-P4, v9.8.x antes de v9.8.3-P4, v9.9.x antes de v9.9.1-P4, y v9.4-ESV y 9.6-ESV antes de v9.6-ESV-R7-P, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio a través de combinaciones no especificadas de registros de recursos. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/bind9_advisory5.asc http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/090346.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/090491.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/090586.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-10/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 29%CPEs: 278EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P3, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P3, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P3, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named daemon exit) via a query for a long resource record. ISC BIND v9.x antes de v9.7.6-P3, v9.8.x antes de v9.8.3-P3, v9.9.x antes de v9.9.1-P3, y v9.4-ESV y v9.6-ESV antes de v9.6-ESV-R7-P3 permite provocar una denegación de servicio (error de aserción y salida de demonio) a atacantes remotos a través de una consulta para un registro de recursos demasiado largo. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/087697.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/087703.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/088381.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security& •

CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 90%CPEs: 256EXPL: 0

ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P1, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P1, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P1, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P1 does not properly handle resource records with a zero-length RDATA section, which allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash or data corruption) or obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted record. ISC BIND v9.x antes de v9.7.6-P1, v9.8.x antes de v9.8.3-P1, v9.9.x antes de v9.9.1-P1, y v9.4-ESV antes de 9.6-ESV-R7-P1 no gestionan adecuadamente los registros de recursos con una sección RDATA de longitud cero, lo que permite a los servidores DNS remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio o corrupción de datos) u obtener información sensible de la memoria del proceso a través de un registro específicamente diseñado para este fin. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Sep/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-06/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-06/msg00010.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134132772016230&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0717.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1110.html http://secunia.com/advisories/51096 http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5501 http://www.debian.org/security/2012&#x • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0

The resolver in ISC BIND 9 through 9.8.1-P1 overwrites cached server names and TTL values in NS records during the processing of a response to an A record query, which allows remote attackers to trigger continued resolvability of revoked domain names via a "ghost domain names" attack. La resolución en ISC BIND v9 a v9.8.1-P1 no implementa una política de actualización de caché, que permite a atacantes remotos provocar resolubilidad continuada de nombres de dominio que ya no están registrados a través de un "Ghost Names exploit" • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=135638082529878&w=2 http://osvdb.org/78916 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0717.html http://secunia.com/advisories/47884 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/542123 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51898 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026647 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/73053 https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/15136456 https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/15136477 https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/ •