CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2019-12165
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-12165
MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. Successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. MiCollab versión 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) y anteriores, versión 7.2 (7.2.2.13) y anteriores, y versión 7.1 (7.1.0.57) y anteriores y MiCollab AWV versión 6.3 (6.3.0.103), versión 6.2 (6.2.2.8), versión 6.1 (6.1. 0.28), versión 6.0 (6.0.0.61) y versión 5.0 (5.0.5.7), presentan una vulnerabilidad de ejecución de comandos. La explotación con éxito de esta vulnerabilidad permitiría a un atacante ejecutar comandos de sistema arbitrarios. • https://www.mitel.com/-/media/mitel/pdf/content-entry-pdf/en-security-bulletin-17-0010-004.pdf •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •