CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 71%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2842 – openssl: doapr_outch function does not verify that certain memory allocation succeeds
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2842
The doapr_outch function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not verify that a certain memory allocation succeeds, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write or memory consumption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0799. La función doapr_outch en crypto/bio/b_print.c en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1s y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2g no verifica que una asignación determinada de memoria tenga éxito, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (escritura fuera de rango o consumo de memoria) o posiblemente causar otro impacto no especificado a través de una cadena de carácteres más larga, como ha quedado demostrado por una gran cantidad de ASN.1 data, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-0799. Several flaws were found in the way BIO_*printf functions were implemented in OpenSSL. Applications which passed large amounts of untrusted data through these functions could crash or potentially execute code with the permissions of the user running such an application. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145983526810210&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146108058503441&w=2 http://openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0722.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0996.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2073.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/84169 https:&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 68%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0798
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0798
Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by providing an invalid username in a connection attempt, related to apps/s_server.c and crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c. Fuga de memoria en la implementación de SRP_VBASE_get_by_user en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1s y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2g permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria) proporcionando un nombre de usuario no válido en un intento de conexión, relacionada con apps/s_server.c y crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.h • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0797 – OpenSSL: BN_hex2bn/BN_dec2bn NULL pointer deref/heap corruption
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0797
Multiple integer overflows in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption or NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long digit string that is mishandled by the (1) BN_dec2bn or (2) BN_hex2bn function, related to crypto/bn/bn.h and crypto/bn/bn_print.c. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1s y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2g permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria dinámica o referencia a puntero NULL) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a través de una cadena de dígitos de gran tamaño que no es manejada correctamente por la función (1) BN_dec2bn o (2) BN_hex2bn, relacionada con crypto/bn/bn.h y crypto/bn/bn_print.c. An integer overflow flaw, leading to a NULL pointer dereference or a heap-based memory corruption, was found in the way some BIGNUM functions of OpenSSL were implemented. Applications that use these functions with large untrusted input could crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00006.h •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 39%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0799 – OpenSSL: Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0799
The fmtstr function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g improperly calculates string lengths, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (overflow and out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2842. La función fmtstr en crypto/bio/b_print.c en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1s y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2g calcula incorrectamenteno longitudes de cadena, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento y lectura fuera de rango) o posiblemente causar otro impacto no especificado a través de una cadena larga de carácteres, como ha quedado demostrado por una gran cantidad de ASN.1 data, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-2842. Several flaws were found in the way BIO_*printf functions were implemented in OpenSSL. Applications which passed large amounts of untrusted data through these functions could crash or potentially execute code with the permissions of the user running such an application. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178358.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178817.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0702 – OpenSSL: Side channel attack on modular exponentiation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0702
The MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF function in crypto/bn/bn_exp.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not properly consider cache-bank access times during modular exponentiation, which makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by running a crafted application on the same Intel Sandy Bridge CPU core as a victim and leveraging cache-bank conflicts, aka a "CacheBleed" attack. La función MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF en crypto/bn/bn_exp.c en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1s y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2g no considera correctamente las veces que se accede al cache-bank durante la exponenciación modular, lo que facilita a usuarios locales descubrir las claves RSA ejecutando una aplicación manipulada en el mismo núcleo de la CPU Intel Sandy Bridge como víctima y aprovechándose de los conflictos del cache-bank, también conocida como un ataque "CacheBleed". A side-channel attack was found that makes use of cache-bank conflicts on the Intel Sandy-Bridge microarchitecture. An attacker who has the ability to control code in a thread running on the same hyper-threaded core as the victim's thread that is performing decryption, could use this flaw to recover RSA private keys. • http://cachebleed.info http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178358.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178817.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse- • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •